Daily Evapotranspiration Calculated with RIEMS Model Output and Its Effect

邵月红,张万昌,刘永和,林炳章
2012-01-01
Abstract:The output products of the RIEMS model are used to calculate daily evapotranspiration (ET) using four different ET estimation methods, such as the modified Penman-Monteith method (P- M), Priestley-Taylor method (P-T), Hargreaves-Samani method (Harg) and the bilinear surface regres- sion empirical function method (BEF). ET estimated from four methods were examined and compared with those so called ground truth transferred from the observed 20 cm evaporation pan data with validated evaporation pan coefficient from six weather stations in upper Yishuhe watershed of the study area. The results show that for the estimation accuracy of ET, BEF algorithns is in the first place; Harg, the see- ord; P-T, the third; and P-M, the fourth, based on four evaluation criterions such as mean bias, mean absolute bias, root mean square error and correlation coefficient. In the daily time series, ET estimation - from four approaches varies with the same trend to the observed evaporation pan generally, but has consid- erable difference in the strongest and the weakest evaporation duration, and in the maximum air tempera- ture and precipitation in July, August and September. As a whole, the ET estimated by BEF method per- forms best and has a good agreement with theobserved value, the other three approaches followed by Harg, P-T and P-M methods have an obvious overestimation. Because of the excellent performance of BEF method and less meteorological parameters needed for ET estimation with RIEMS predicted meteorological variables, BEF method was recommended as the best ET estimation approach to provide accurate ET for driving Hydrological process model TOPX coupled with RIEMS for the hydrometerological predictions in upper Yishuhe watershed, Shandong Province,.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?