Abstract:We consider the problem of regulating products with negative externalities to a third party that is neither the buyer nor the seller, but where both the buyer and seller can take steps to mitigate the externality. The motivating example to have in mind is the sale of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, many of which have historically been compromised for DDoS attacks that disrupted Internet-wide services such as Twitter. Neither the buyer (i.e., consumers) nor seller (i.e., IoT manufacturers) was known to suffer from the attack, but both have the power to expend effort to secure their devices. We consider a regulator who regulates payments (via fines if the device is compromised, or market prices directly), or the product directly via mandatory security requirements. Both regulations come at a cost---implementing security requirements increases production costs, and the existence of fines decreases consumers' values---thereby reducing the seller's profits. The focus of this paper is to understand the \emph{efficiency} of various regulatory policies. That is, policy A is more efficient than policy B if A more successfully minimizes negatives externalities, while both A and B reduce seller's profits equally. We develop a simple model to capture the impact of regulatory policies on a buyer's behavior. {In this model, we show that for \textit{homogeneous} markets---where the buyer's ability to follow security practices is always high or always low---the optimal (externality-minimizing for a given profit constraint) regulatory policy need regulate \emph{only} payments \emph{or} production.} In arbitrary markets, by contrast, we show that while the optimal policy may require regulating both aspects, there is always an approximately optimal policy which regulates just one.

A classroom game on a negative externality correcting tax: Revenue return, regressivity, and the double dividend

Effect of Environment Pollution on Taxes and Countermeasures

Taxing the Second Nature ∗

Optimal environmental tax swaps and double dividend hypothesis

Environmental Taxes under Mixed Duopoly: the Roles of Privatization and Foreign Eco-Technology

Achieving an efficient and fair equilibrium through taxation

Integrating Tax Distortions and Externality Theory

Environmental Tax Reform and the “Double Dividend” Hypothesis in a Small Open Economy

Distortionary, Non-Distortionary, and Distributional Properties of Environmental Taxes: Extension of Sandmo's Observation

Environmental Regulation for Non-point Source Pollution in a Cournot Three-Stage Game

Controlling Human Utilization of Failure-Prone Systems via Taxes

Environmental Injustice: The Effects of Environmental Taxes on Income Distribution in an Oligopolistic General Equilibrium Model

Learning Optimal Tax Design in Nonatomic Congestion Games

Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight Rationality

A Free and Fair Economy: A Game of Justice and Inclusion

Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab

How do governments actually use environmental taxes?

Environmental tax reform and double dividend evidence

Modeling Tax Declaration Behavior and Quality of Tax Processing: A Game Theory Approach

Selling a Single Item with Negative Externalities

Optimal Taxation with Misperception on Prices