Environmental Injustice: The Effects of Environmental Taxes on Income Distribution in an Oligopolistic General Equilibrium Model

Ronald R. Kumar,Peter J. Stauvermann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104142

IF: 3.9

2024-05-16

Sustainability

Abstract:We apply a static oligopolistic general equilibrium model to investigate the effects of an environmental tax on labor incomes, capital incomes, profits, and the distribution of income. The study is motivated by the fact that environmental taxation is one main political tool to realize environmental sustainability and support sustainable development. However, to ensure social and economic sustainability, the taxes applied must be perceived as fair by the majority of the civil society. Moreover, efforts to determine a fair taxation policy would ensure, inter alia, responsible consumption and production, and lower inequality in the economy, which are one of the two priorities of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 10 and 12). Therefore, it is necessary to determine the tax incidence to inform policymakers regarding the distribution of the tax burden. To examine environmental policy, we assume the government applies a policy objective to realize strong environmental sustainability, as proposed by the Dutch economist Rofie Hueting. The main result is that oligopolistic firms can shift the whole tax burden resulting from environmental taxes to workers and capital owners. Consequently, we show that environmental taxes can lead to more income inequality, and the more concentrated the markets, the bigger the social and economic inequality. Noting that addressing environmental problems is a priority of the UN SDGs, our analysis shows that approaching the issue using just environmental tax propositions is not advisable. These results of the analysis also provide a justification of why many members of the society tend to oppose environmental taxes.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **the impact of environmental taxes on income distribution, especially in an oligopoly market structure**.

Specifically, the paper explores the following key points:
1. **The fairness issue of environmental taxes**: As a major policy tool for achieving environmental sustainability, environmental taxes may lead to income distribution inequality. This is because environmental taxes have a greater impact on low - income groups (i.e., they are "regressive"), as they spend a larger proportion of their income on energy consumption.
2. **The particularity of the oligopoly market**: In an oligopoly market, enterprises may be able to fully shift the burden of environmental taxes onto workers and capital owners. This shifting mechanism may lead to greater social and economic inequality, especially in cases of high market concentration.
3. **The necessity of policy recommendations**: In order to ensure the social and economic sustainability of environmental policies, it is necessary to fully understand the distribution effects of environmental taxes and design more equitable tax policies.

### Core objectives of the paper
By constructing a static oligopoly general equilibrium model, the paper analyzes the impact of environmental taxes on labor income, capital income, profit, and overall income distribution. Its purposes are to reveal:
- How environmental taxes are shifted by enterprises in an oligopoly market;
- How this shifting exacerbates income inequality;
- How market concentration further amplifies this inequality.

Ultimately, the paper hopes to provide theoretical basis for policymakers to help design tax policies that can both protect the environment and promote social fairness.

### Formula summary
The key formulas involved in the paper include:
1. The development equation of environmental function:
$$
E_{t + 1}=E_t(1 + \delta)-D(P(Y_t))
$$
where:
- $E_t$ and $E_{t + 1}$ represent the environmental function states in period $t$ and period $t + 1$ respectively;
- $\delta>0$ represents the ability of the environmental function to absorb damage and recover;
- $D(P(Y_t))$ represents the emissions generated by economic activities.

2. The sustainable condition of the environmental function:
$$
E_t\delta - D(P_t)\geq0
$$

3. The impact of emission reduction technology:
$$
D = D(P, T_r),\quad\text{where }D_P>0\text{ and }D_{T_r}<0
$$
where $T_r$ represents the real tax revenue used to reduce environmental damage.

Through these formulas, the paper quantifies the impact of environmental taxes on income distribution and social inequality and proposes directions for improving policy design.