Abstract:In this paper we examine capital income taxation of a reference dependent sufficiently loss averse investor in a two period portfolio choice model under full loss offset provisions. Capital income taxation with loss offset provisions has been found to stimulate risk taking in expected utility models under certain assumptions about attitudes towards risk but would such effect be found under prospect theory type of preferences? We observe that the impact of capital income taxation depends on investors’ reference levels relative to their endowment income and thus we explore capital income taxation for different types of loss averse investors in terms of their ambition. We consider the less ambitious investors to be the ones with relatively low reference levels (they avoid relative losses in both periods) and more ambitious investors to be those with relatively high reference levels. We analyze two types of more ambitious investors: investors with higher time preference (who experience relative losses only in the second period under the bad state of nature) and investors with lower time preference (who experience relative losses only in the first period). We observe that capital income taxation stimulates current consumption in most cases which encourages risk taking, although the final outcome would depend on the investors’ degree of risk aversion, the rate of time preference and the tax rate in relation to certain thresholds. Current consumption could be discouraged for some ambitious type of investors that have relatively high second period reference levels but not necessary first period reference levels. in summary, to determine the impact of capital income taxation on the decision variables the reference levels in relation to endowment income play the most significant role. Ignoring reference depended preferences can lead to different conclusions for investors reaction to capital income taxation. We also find certain type of investors whose happiness level increases with capital income taxation under full loss offset provisions.

Controlling Human Utilization of Failure-Prone Systems via Taxes

Random carbon tax policy and investment into emission abatement technologies

Fragility of the Commons under Prospect-Theoretic Risk Attitudes

The Unintended Consequences of Minimizing the Price of Anarchy in Congestion Games

Supporting punishment via taxation in a structured population

Capital Income Taxation under Full loss offset Provisions of a Prospect Theory Investor

Achieving an efficient and fair equilibrium through taxation

Can Taxes Improve Congestion on All Networks?

The Effectiveness of Subsidies and Tolls in Congestion Games

Learning Optimal Tax Design in Nonatomic Congestion Games

Effects of Carbon Emission Taxes on Transportation Mode Selections and Social Welfare

The paradigm of tax-reward and tax-punishment strategies in the advancement of public resource management dynamics

Carrots or Sticks? The Effectiveness of Subsidies and Tolls in Congestion Games

Optimal taxation of risky entrepreneurial capital

In Congestion Games, Taxes Achieve Optimal Approximation

Continuous-Time Public Good Contribution under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Control Approach

A classroom game on a negative externality correcting tax: Revenue return, regressivity, and the double dividend

Effect of tax dynamics on linearly growing processes under stochastic resetting: a possible economic model

Game-Theoretic Choice of Curing Rates Against Networked SIS Epidemics by Human Decision-Makers

Optimal taxation and the Domar-Musgrave effect