Trail cameras can greatly inflate nest predation rates

John‐André Henden,Rolf Anker Ims,Marita Anti Strømeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22684
2024-11-30
Journal of Wildlife Management
Abstract:Based on an experiment in Arctic tundra we demonstrate that nest cameras attracted predators, which caused an extremely, positively biased predation rate that was consistent over a range of experimental and environmental conditions. Hence, we call for caution when implementing new technologies for monitoring species interactions without proper prior testing regarding potential unforeseen effects on the monitored species. Photographic monitoring currently provides the most accurate means for identifying nest predators and eventually their role in bird population declines worldwide. However, previous studies have found that commercially available trail cameras represent an artificial structure that tend to negatively bias predation rates, likely through predator neophobia. Based on an experiment in Arctic tundra, involving 50 artificial nests and 30 cameras in each of 2 breeding seasons, we demonstrated that trail cameras attracted corvids (in particular ravens [Corvus corax]), which caused an extreme and positively biased predation rate that was consistent over a range of experimental and environmental conditions. We call for new technologies that allow for photographic monitoring of bird nests with minimal visual footprints, in the form of smaller cameras and more efficient internal batteries to minimize novel and conspicuous external features detectable by predators. However, even such improved devices need to be assessed with respect to potential effects on nest predation in each case.
ecology,zoology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?