Abstract:We used DNA collected from eggshells from predated sage‐grouse nests to identify nest predators. We evaluated the influence of habitat and grazing on predator‐specific nest predation. We evaluated the efficacy of our genetic method by deploying artificial nests with trail cameras and compared the results of our genetic method to the species captured via trail camera. Greater sage‐grouse (hereafter sage‐grouse; Centrocercus urophasianus) populations have declined across their range. Increased nest predation as a result of anthropogenic land use is one mechanism proposed to explain these declines. However, sage‐grouse contend with a diverse suite of nest predators that vary in functional traits (e.g., search tactics or hunting mode) and abundance. Consequently, generalizing about factors influencing nest fate is challenging. Identifying the explicit predator species responsible for nest predation events is, therefore, critical to understanding causal mechanisms linking land use to patterns of sage‐grouse nest success. Cattle grazing is often assumed to adversely affect sage‐grouse recruitment by reducing grass height (and hence cover), thereby facilitating nest detection by predators. However, recent evidence found little support for the hypothesized effect of grazing on nest fate at the pasture scale. Rather, nest success appears to be similar on pastures grazed at varying intensities. One possible explanation for the lack of observed effect involves a localized response by one or more nest predators. The presence of cattle may cause a temporary reduction in predator density and/or use within a pasture (the cattle avoidance hypothesis). The cattle avoidance hypothesis predicts a decreased probability of at least one sage‐grouse nest predator predating sage‐grouse nests in pastures with livestock relative to pastures without livestock present during the nesting season. To test the cattle avoidance hypothesis, we collected predator DNA from eggshells from predated nests and used genetic methods to identify the sage‐grouse nest predator(s) responsible for the predation event. We evaluated the influence of habitat and grazing on predator‐specific nest predation. We evaluated the efficacy of our genetic method by deploying artificial nests with trail cameras and compared the results of our genetic method to the species captured via trail camera. Our molecular methods identified at least one nest predator captured predating artificial nests via trail camera for 33 of 35 (94%) artificial nests. We detected nest predators via our molecular analysis at 76 of 114 (67%) predated sage‐grouse nests. The primary predators detected at sage‐grouse nests were coyotes (Canis latrans) and corvids (Corvidea). Grazing did not influence the probability of nest predation by either coyotes or corvids. Sagebrush canopy cover was negatively associated with the probability a coyote predated a nest, distance to water was positively associated with the probability a corvid predated a nest, and average minimum temperature was negatively associated with the probability that either a coyote or a corvid predated a nest. Our study provides a framework for implementing an effective, non‐invasive method for identifying sage‐grouse nest predators that can be used to better understand how management actions at local and regional scales may impact an important component of sage‐grouse recruitment.

The Big Four reign in eutrophic lake reedbeds: predation on artificial waterbird nests

Disentangling ground-nest predation rates through an artificial nests experiment in an area with western capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) presence: martens are the key

Predation Patterns on Artificial Nests of Ground Nesting Pheasants in the Montane Forest, Southwest China

Diet of the raccoon dog, an invasive mesopredator, during the breeding season of declining waterbird populations

Balancing between predation risk and food by boreal breeding ducks

Riding the wetland wave: Can ducks locate macroinvertebrate resources across the breeding season?

Productivity of the Great Egret (Ardea alba) and Grey Heron (A. cinerea) in mixed heronries in Poland and behavioral response of fledglings to a drone

Anthropogenic bottom‐up and top‐down impacts on boreal breeding waterbirds

Mammalian predators and vegetated nesting habitat drive reduced protected area nesting success of Kentish plovers, Yellow Sea region, China

Experiments Reveal That Search Image Might Be Responsible for Seasonal Variation in Nest-Predation Rates

Risk assessment during nest defense against three simulated predators by female northern house wrens ( )

Multiscale nest-site selection and breeding biology: infrared camera monitoring of the great crested grebe Podiceps cristatus in a plateau freshwater lake in southwestern China

Too Risky to Settle: Avian Community Structure Changes in Response to Perceived Predation Risk on Adults and Offspring

Predation och störningar i skrattmåskolonier

Detection and density of breeding marsh birds in Iowa wetlands

Trail cameras can greatly inflate nest predation rates

Landscape homogenization due to agricultural intensification disrupts the relationship between reproductive success and main prey abundance in an avian predator

Nest survival of Crested Lark (Galerida cristata) in intensively used habitats in Central Poland

Breeding waterbird species as ecological indicators of shifts from turbid to clear water conditions in northwest European shallow eutrophic lakes

Predator‐specific mortality of sage‐grouse nests based on predator DNA on eggshells

Protecting wild bird nests against predators: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of non‐lethal methods