Abstract:To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs. Implementing effective, affordable and ethical conservation management will be crucial for minimising future biodiversity losses. Such management requires reliable foundational evidence to help managers make informed choices about how to address the needs of their target species. Unfortunately, such evidence is still lacking for many species and management scenarios. One major global challenge is improving the reproductive success of threatened species in the context of predation. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of in situ experiments that used non‐lethal methods to protect bird nests against predators, with the aims of summarising global trends in nest protection efforts, comparing the effectiveness of different protection measures and informing future research and management. We considered peer‐reviewed studies in English. We detected a large geographic and taxonomic bias in the evidence base with 58% of articles conducted in North America and 76% on ground‐nesting birds. Less than 3% of articles involved taxa listed as Endangered or Critically Endangered and 51% of study units lasted just a single breeding season. Nests protected with exclosures, fences and guards were more likely to be successful than their unprotected controls. Interventions involving deterrents, conditioned taste aversion, chemical camouflage and diversionary feeding did not have a significant positive effect on nest success, but the interventions in these categories were less common and more diverse in nature. Synthesis and applications. To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs.

Empirical evidence that diversionary feeding increases productivity in ground-nesting birds.

Evaluating diversionary feeding as a method to resolve conservation conflicts in a recovering ecosystem

Disturbance‐related redistribution of western capercaillie Tetrao urogallus away from woodland tracks

Anti-Predator Vigilance as an Indicator of the Costs and Benefits of Supplemental Feeding in Newly Released ‘Alalā (Corvus hawaiiensis)

Protecting wild bird nests against predators: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of non‐lethal methods

Food supplementing peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus tundrius) nests increase reproductive success with no change in mean parental provisioning rate

Effects of Supplementary Feeding on the Breeding Ecology of the Buff-Throated Partridge in a Tibetan Sacred Site, China

Reducing risky interactions: Identifying barriers to the successful management of human–wildlife conflict in an urban parkland

Evidence of anthropogenic subsidisation of red foxes in a national park important for breeding wading birds

Disentangling ground-nest predation rates through an artificial nests experiment in an area with western capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) presence: martens are the key

Impact and control of feral cats preying on wandering albatrosses: Insights from a field experiment

No evidence for the consistent effect of supplementary feeding on home range size in terrestrial mammals

Visitation rate, but not foraging range, responds to brood size manipulation in an aerial insectivore

Selfish herd effects in aggregated caterpillars and their interaction with warning signals

Birds affected by a 2021 avian mortality event are strongly associated with supplemental feeding and ground foraging behaviors

The Effects of Supplemental Perch Sites on Avian Predation and Demography of Vole Populations

Citizen science observations shed light on how anthropogenic food sources influence wildlife disease

A meta-analysis of the effects of common management actions on the nest success of North American birds

Too Risky to Settle: Avian Community Structure Changes in Response to Perceived Predation Risk on Adults and Offspring

Experimental Evidence Shows the Importance of Behavioural Plasticity and Body Size under Competition in Waterfowl