Abstract:Our study found no effect of collecting biological samples for disease surveillance on survival of blue‐winged teal, including an additional test comparing sampling with oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs versus swabs and a syringe‐drawn blood sample, but survival probabilities had wide credible intervals, which may indicate a lack of power to detect an effect. Our results indicate that it may be unnecessary to use a conservative approach of eliminating individuals that had a biological sample taken from demographic analyses, allowing for alignment between disease surveillance and waterfowl banding efforts. Outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in wild animals highlight the need for disease surveillance in wild birds to improve our understanding of their role as reservoirs and dispersers, and potential threats to domestic poultry and wild bird populations. Surveillance for avian influenza varies in its approach, objectives, and coordination with other monitoring efforts. For waterfowl, a common host to avian influenza viruses, banding represents a concerted effort of capturing and marking thousands of individuals annually to estimate survival and harvest rates, but users of these data have generally taken a conservative approach to remove any banded birds from analyses that had a sample taken for disease surveillance during capture. We tested for differences in survival and encounter probabilities of blue‐winged teal (Spatula discors) marked (n = 21,702 teal) and sampled for disease surveillance (n = 4,216) during the nonbreeding season in Louisiana, USA, from 2016 to 2023. Although we found no consistent effect of collecting biological samples on survival probability, including an additional test showing no detectable effects of sampling for disease surveillance with oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs versus sampling with swabs and a syringe‐drawn blood sample, wide 95% credible intervals on the posterior survival estimates (mean 0.36 difference between upper and lower values across all year‐sex‐sampling groups; 0.44 for sampling type groups) indicated low statistical power to detect an effect. Seber recovery probability during the first interval following sampling was lower among birds sampled using swabs only, but we assume this stems from low sample sizes rather than an effect of collecting biological samples. Because recovery probabilities can vary as a function of individual covariates, we also examined direct recovery probabilities and observed no meaningful effect of disease surveillance sampling type but strong effects of capture date, suggesting the effect on Seber recovery probability may have been due to heterogeneity in exposure to natural and harvest mortality risks. Although we suggest that aligning disease surveillance sample collection efforts with landscape‐scale waterfowl banding efforts may have little effect on observed demographic rates, additional studies with larger sample sizes are likely needed to provide the statistical power necessary to formally conclude no effect of biological sampling on survival probabilities.

Birds affected by a 2021 avian mortality event are strongly associated with supplemental feeding and ground foraging behaviors

Wild bird mass mortalities in eastern Canada associated with the Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) virus, 2022

Strengths and limitations of using participatory science data to characterize a wildlife mass mortality event

Current perspectives in avian nutrition: domestic animal models and their role in conservation management

Global Birdwatching Data Reveal Uneven Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Citizen science observations shed light on how anthropogenic food sources influence wildlife disease

Seabird and sea duck mortalities were lower during the second breeding season in eastern Canada following the introduction of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A H5Nx viruses

A systematic review of laboratory investigations into the pathogenesis of avian influenza viruses in wild avifauna of North America

Widespread arboreal foraging behavior in ground-dwelling birds and the urgency of life-history studies

Geographic, ecological, and temporal patterns of seabird mortality during the 2022 HPAI H5N1 outbreak on the island of Newfoundland

Utilizing citizen science data to rapidly assess changing associations between wild birds and avian influenza outbreaks in poultry

Sampling for disease surveillance: assessing effects on blue‐winged teal survival and recovery

Descriptive Epidemiology of and Response to the High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza (H5N8) Epidemic in South African Coastal Seabirds, 2018

Prevalence of Avian Influenza Virus in Synanthropic Birds Associated with an Outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Strain EA/AM H5N1

Discovery of a novel bandavirus using metagenomic sequencing in a retrospective analysis of an unresolved 2020 mortality event involving black vultures in the northeastern United States.

Spatial ecotoxicology: What we know about the relationship between avian movements and contaminant levels

Rapid mortality in captive bush dogs ( ) caused by influenza A of avian origin (H5N1) at a wildlife collection in the United Kingdom

Understanding spatiotemporal effects of food supplementation on host–parasite interactions using community‐based science

Ecology and Management of a Large Outbreak of Avian Botulism in Wild Waterbirds in Northeastern Italy (2019-2022)