Abstract:PURPOSEHigh-sensitivity and high-resolution depth-encoding positron emission tomography (PET) detectors are required to simultaneously improve the sensitivity and spatial resolution of a PET scanner so that the quantitative accuracy of PET studies can be improved. The semi-monolithic scintillator PET detector has the advantage of measuring the depth of interaction with single-ended readout as compared to the traditional pixelated scintillator detector, and significantly reducing the edge effect that deteriorates the spatial resolution at edges of the detector as compared to the monolithic scintillator detector if a long rectangular semi-monolithic detector is used. In this work, depth-encoding PET detector modules were built by using long rectangular semi-monolithic scintillators and single-ended readout by silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) arrays. The performance of the detector modules was measured.METHODSThe rectangular semi-monolithic scintillator detector has an outside dimension of 11.6 × 37.6 × 10 mm3 and consists of 11 polished lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slices measuring 1 × 37.6 × 10 mm3 . The enhanced specular reflector (ESR) was glued on both cross-sectional surfaces of each crystal slice. For the face opposite to the SiPM array and the two end faces of the detectors, surface treatments with and without black paint were implemented for performance comparison. The bottom face of the semi-monolithic detector was coupled to a 4 × 12 SiPM array that was grouped along rows and columns separately into 16 signals. The four row signals were used to identify the slices, and the 12 column signals were used to estimate the y (monolithic direction) and z (depth direction) interaction positions. The detector was irradiated at multiple positions with a collimated 511 keV gamma beam. The collimated beam was obtained with electronic collimation by using a 22 Na point source and a reference detector. The estimated width of the gamma beam is around 0.5 mm. The flood histogram for crystal slices was measured by using the center of gravity (COG) method. The COG method and the squared COG method were used for y position estimation. The standard deviation of the column signals, the ratio of maximum to the sum of the column signals, and the sum of squared column signals were used for z position estimation.RESULTSAll slices were clearly resolved from the measured flood histograms for both detectors with different crystal surface treatments. The estimated y positions roughly linearly change with the true positions at the middle of the detector until ~5 mm from both ends of the detector. The y and z spatial resolutions of the detectors were estimated for all middle positions located more than 5 mm from both ends of the detector. The squared COG method provides better y position resolution than the COG method. The three z estimation methods provide similar depth of interaction (DOI) resolution. Surface treatment with black paint significantly improves both y and z position resolution but degrades the energy and timing resolution of the detectors. The average full width half maxima (FWHM) spatial resolution is improved from 1.77 to 1.07 mm in the y direction by using the squared COG method and from 2.71 to 1.55 mm in the z direction by using the standard deviation method. The slice-based average energy resolution degrades from 15.8% to 24.9%. The timing resolution of the entire detector module degrades from 596 to 788 ps.CONCLUSIONThe performance of rectangular semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors with two different crystal surface treatments was measured. The detectors provide superior spatial resolution and depth-encoding capability and can be used to develop small animal and dedicated breast and brain PET scanners that can simultaneously achieve high spatial resolution, high sensitivity, and low cost.

Physical and imaging performance of SIAT aPET under different energy windows and timing windows

Design and performance of SIAT aPET: a uniform high-resolution small animal PET scanner using dual-ended readout detectors

Effect of depth of interaction resolution on the performance of SIAT aPET

Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET scanner with 213 mm axis using NEMA NU 4‐2008

A High-Sensitivity Small-Animal Pet Scanner: Development and Initial Performance Measurements

Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4–2008 standards

Mutual Interferences Between SIAT Apet Insert and a 3 T Umr 790 MRI Scanner.

Mutual interferences between SIAT aPET insert and a 3T uMR 790 MRI scanner

H 2 RSPET: a 0.5 mm resolution high-sensitivity small-animal PET scanner, a simulation study

Performance of Long Rectangular Semi‐monolithic Scintillator PET Detectors

Development and Performance of SIAT Bpet: a High-Resolution and High-Sensitivity MR-compatible Brain PET Scanner Using Dual-Ended Readout Detectors.

A comparative study of crystal geometry, material, and reconstruction algorithms on MicroPET scanner performance

Initial Testing of Singles Processing Unit for the Small Animal PET

Development of a Prototype PET Scanner with Depth-of-interaction Measurement Using Solid-State Photomultiplier Arrays and Parallel Readout Electronics.

Dual-ended Readout Small Animal PET Detector by Using 0.5 Mm Pixelated LYSO Crystal Arrays and SiPMs

NEMA-2008 and In-Vivo Animal and Plant Imaging Performance of the Large FOV Preclinical Digital PET/CT System Discoverist 180

Development of Depth Encoding Small Animal PET Detectors Using Dual-Ended Readout of Pixelated Scintillator Arrays with SiPMs

MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging

Development of a SiPM-based PET imaging system for small animals

Evaluation of a PET Detector for a Next Generation Preclinical PET/EPRI

Development and Performance Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Positron Emission Tomography Scanner Dedicated for Small-Animal Imaging