A comparative study of crystal geometry, material, and reconstruction algorithms on MicroPET scanner performance

Alireza Sadremomtaz,Payvand Taherparvar,Mohaddeseh Saber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/08/p08028
2024-09-01
Journal of Instrumentation
Abstract:Small-animal PET, also known as microPET, has been developed to enhance image quality by improving spatial resolution and sensitivity due to its smaller ring and crystal size. However, the reduction of crystal size and the presence of gaps between cuboidal crystals could reduce sensitivity. MicroPET with tapered arrays has been developed to simultaneously improve sensitivity and spatial resolution. This study compared the performance of 14 × 14 and 28 × 28 array microPETs using LSO and CZT crystal materials. The impact of crystal design and reconstruction algorithms on image quality and performance parameters was investigated, using GATE Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The findings showed that sensitivity increased with crystal thickness, particularly in LSO. The 14 × 14 arrays consistently exhibited higher sensitivity, while the 28 × 28 arrays had superior spatial resolution. NECR values increased with crystal thickness, with LSO outperforming CZT. Scatter and random fractions were low. Different reconstruction algorithms had negligible effects on FWHM and CNR but influenced SNR, with the COSEM algorithm achieving significantly reduced noise. The small size of crystals and tapered arrays contributed to improved sensitivity and spatial resolution. However, there was a trade-off between sensitivity and spatial resolution. LSO crystals showed better performance, but the choice between array sizes depended on specific imaging requirements. This study provides insights into optimizing microPET design for enhanced imaging capabilities.
instruments & instrumentation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?