Development of Depth Encoding Small Animal PET Detectors Using Dual-Ended Readout of Pixelated Scintillator Arrays with SiPMs

Zhonghua Kuang,Ziru Sang,Xiaohui Wang,Xin Fu,Ning Ren,Xianming Zhang,Yunfei Zheng,Qian Yang,Zhanli Hu,Junwei Du,Dong Liang,Xin Liu,Hairong Zheng,Yongfeng Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12722
IF: 4.506
2017-01-01
Medical Physics
Abstract:PurposeThe performance of current small animal PET scanners is mainly limited by the detector performance and depth encoding detectors are required to develop PET scanner to simultaneously achieve high spatial resolution and high sensitivity. Among all depth encoding PET detector approaches, dual‐ended readout detector has the advantage to achieve the highest depth of interaction (DOI) resolution and spatial resolution. Silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) is believed to be the photodetector of the future for PET detector due to its excellent properties as compared to the traditional photodetectors such as photomultiplier tube (PMT) and avalanche photodiode (APD). The purpose of this work is to develop high resolution depth encoding small animal PET detector using dual‐ended readout of finely pixelated scintillator arrays with SiPMs.MethodsFour lutetium‐yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) arrays with 11 × 11 crystals and 11.6 × 11.6 × 20 mm3 outside dimension were made using ESR, Toray and BaSO4 reflectors. The LYSO arrays were read out with Hamamatsu 4 × 4 SiPM arrays from both ends. The SiPM array has a pixel size of 3 × 3 mm2, 0.2 mm gap in between the pixels and a total active area of 12.6 × 12.6 mm2. The flood histograms, DOI resolution, energy resolution and timing resolution of the four detector modules were measured and compared.ResultsAll crystals can be clearly resolved from the measured flood histograms of all four arrays. The BaSO4 arrays provide the best and the ESR array provides the worst flood histograms. The DOI resolution obtained from the DOI profiles of the individual crystals of the four array is from 2.1 to 2.35 mm for events with E > 350 keV. The DOI ratio variation among crystals is bigger for the BaSO4 arrays as compared to both the ESR and Toray arrays. The BaSO4 arrays provide worse detector based DOI resolution. The photopeak amplitude of the Toray array had the maximum change with depth, it provides the worst energy resolution of 21.3%. The photopeak amplitude of the BaSO4 array with 80 μm reflector almost doesn't change with depth, it provides the best energy resolution of 12.9%. A maximum timing shift of 1.37 ns to 1.61 ns among the corner and the center crystals in the four arrays was obtained due to the use of resistor network readout. A crystal based timing resolution of 0.68 ns to 0.83 ns and a detector based timing resolution of 1.26 ns to 1.45 ns were obtained for the four detector modules.ConclusionsFour high resolution depth encoding small animal PET detectors were developed using dual‐ended readout of pixelated scintillator arrays with SiPMs. The performance results show that those detectors can be used to build a small animal PET scanner to simultaneously achieve uniform high spatial resolution and high sensitivity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?