Abstract:In an innovative system, it is essential to keep under control the crucial development phases, which should consider several aspects involving, for instance, the modeling or the assessment of suitable analytical representations. Aiming to pursue a final demonstration to verify the actual capability of an engineering idea, however, some fundamental elements may have been partially considered. Many projects state the initial and final technology readiness level based on the famous scale introduced by the US National and Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) many years ago and now widespread in many fields of technology innovation. Its nine-step definition provides a high-level indication of the maturity of the observed innovative system. Trivially, the resolution of that macroscopic meter is not made for catching advancement details, but it rather provides comprehensive information on the examined technology. It is, therefore, necessary to refer to more sophisticated analysis tools that can show a more accurate picture of the development stage and helps designers to highlight points that deserve further attention and deeper analysis. The risk is to perform a very good demonstration test that can miss generality and remain confined only to that specific experimental campaign. Moving on to these assumptions, the authors expose three realizations of theirs concerning aeronautic morphing systems, to the analysis of a well-assessed Technology Readiness Level instrument. The aim is to define the aspects to be further assessed, the aspect to be considered fully mature, and even aspects that could miss some elementary point to attain full maturation. Such studies are not so frequent in the literature, and the authors believe to give a valuable, yet preliminary, contribution to the engineering of breakthrough systems. Without losing generality, the paper refers to the 2.2 version of a tool set up by the US Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), and NASA, with the aim to standardize the evaluation process of the mentioned nine-step TRL.

TRL analysis of IFMIF-DONES

Update of the 5 MW Beam-on-Target Requirements for improvement of the materials irradiation performance at IFMIF-DONES

Engineering design status of IFMIF-DONES High Energy Beam Transport line and Beam Dump system inside the TIR and RIZ

Status of the engineering design of the IFMIF-DONES high energy beam transport line and beam dump system

Neutronic analysis of IFMIF-DONES test cell cooling system

The IFMIF-DONES Diagnostics and Control Systems: Current Design Status, Integration Issues and Future Perspectives Embedding Artificial Intelligence Tools

Production of 177Lu at the IFMIF-DONES Facility

Progress in design and experimental activities for the development of an advanced breeding blanket

Updates of the removable biological shielding blocks inside of the test cell, part of the test systems of IFMIF-DONES

Alignment strategy for IFMIF-DONES facility

Shielding optimization to reduce the radiation field in the accelerator systems of IFMIF-DONES

IFMIF/EVEDA achievements overview

Production of 177Lu with deuterons at IFMIF-DONES facility

Instrumentation integration in the European Test Blanket Modules

Neutronic Assessment of Candidate Materials for TF Coils Shielding in a DEMO Fusion Reactor Based on a DCLL Blanket

Neutronic assessment of the IFMIF-DONES HFTM specimen stack distribution

Progress in the ITER neutral beam test facility

Optimization and evaluation of structural and shielding concrete for IFMIF-DONES

Neutron availability in the Complementary Experiments Hall of the IFMIF-DONES facility

The LiFIRE experimental facility: Final design, construction and experimental campaign

A Preliminary Technology Readiness Assessment of Morphing Technology Applied to Case Studies