Abstract:Intrinsically disordered proteins and regions (collectively, IDRs) are pervasive across proteomes in all kingdoms of life, help to shape biological functions and are involved in numerous diseases. IDRs populate a diverse set of transiently formed structures and defy conventional sequence–structure–function relationships 1 . Developments in protein science have made it possible to predict the three-dimensional structures of folded proteins at the proteome scale 2 . By contrast, there is a lack of knowledge about the conformational properties of IDRs, partly because the sequences of disordered proteins are poorly conserved and also because only a few of these proteins have been characterized experimentally. The inability to predict structural properties of IDRs across the proteome has limited our understanding of the functional roles of IDRs and how evolution shapes them. As a supplement to previous structural studies of individual IDRs 3 , we developed an efficient molecular model to generate conformational ensembles of IDRs and thereby to predict their conformational properties from sequences 4,5 . Here we use this model to simulate nearly all of the IDRs in the human proteome. Examining conformational ensembles of 28,058 IDRs, we show how chain compaction is correlated with cellular function and localization. We provide insights into how sequence features relate to chain compaction and, using a machine-learning model trained on our simulation data, show the conservation of conformational properties across orthologues. Our results recapitulate observations from previous studies of individual protein systems and exemplify how to link—at the proteome scale—conformational ensembles with cellular function and localization, amino acid sequence, evolutionary conservation and disease variants. Our freely available database of conformational properties will encourage further experimental investigation and enable the generation of hypotheses about the biological roles and evolution of IDRs.

Structural biases in disordered proteins are prevalent in the cell

Advantages of Proteins Being Disordered

Do Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Possess High Specificity in Proteinprotein Interactions?

Binding Cavities and Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Conformational ensembles of the human intrinsically disordered proteome

Conservation of Potentially Druggable Cavities in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identification of Intrinsic Disorder in Complexes from the Protein Data Bank

Smoothing molecular interactions: The “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins

AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins at the Nano-scale

Intramolecular Structural Heterogeneity altered by Long-range Contacts in an Intrinsically Disordered Protein

Ligand clouds around protein clouds: a scenario of ligand binding with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Functions of short lifetime biological structures at large: the case of intrinsically disordered proteins

Design of intrinsically disordered protein variants with diverse structural properties

Intrinsically disordered proteins can behave as different polymers across their conformational ensemble

Chapter Six - Functional unfoldomics: Roles of intrinsic disorder in protein (multi)functionality

Resolving the ambiguity: Making sense of intrinsic disorder when PDB structures disagree

On the Origins of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Structural and Functional Relevance of Charge Based Transient Interactions inside Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

On the potential of machine learning to examine the relationship between sequence, structure, dynamics and function of intrinsically disordered proteins

Encoding Structure in Intrinsically Disordered Protein Biomaterials