Abstract:We report simulation studies of 33 single intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) using coarse-grained bead-spring models where interactions among different amino acids are introduced through a hydropathy matrix and additional screened Coulomb interaction for the charged amino acid beads. Our simulation studies of two different hydropathy scales (HPS1, HPS2) [Dignon et al., PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005941 (2018); Tesei et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2111696118 (2021)] and the comparison with the existing experimental data indicate an optimal interaction parameter ε = 0.1 and 0.2 kcal/mol for the HPS1 and HPS2 hydropathy scales. We use these best-fit parameters to investigate both the universal aspects as well as the fine structures of the individual IDPs by introducing additional characteristics. (i) First, we investigate the polymer-specific scaling relations of the IDPs in comparison to the universal scaling relations [Bair et al., J. Chem. Phys. 158, 204902 (2023)] for the homopolymers. By studying the scaled end-to-end distances ⟨RN2⟩/(2Llp) and the scaled transverse fluctuations l̃⊥2=⟨l⊥2⟩/L, we demonstrate that IDPs are broadly characterized with a Flory exponent of ν ≃ 0.56 with the conclusion that conformations of the IDPs interpolate between Gaussian and self-avoiding random walk chains. Then, we introduce (ii) Wilson charge index (W) that captures the essential features of charge interactions and distribution in the sequence space and (iii) a skewness index (S) that captures the finer shape variation of the gyration radii distributions as a function of the net charge per residue and charge asymmetry parameter. Finally, our study of the (iv) variation of ⟨Rg⟩ as a function of salt concentration provides another important metric to bring out finer characteristics of the IDPs, which may carry relevant information for the origin of life.

Do Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Possess High Specificity in Proteinprotein Interactions?

Smoothing molecular interactions: The “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins

Interplay Between Binding Affinity and Kinetics in Protein–protein Interactions

Advantages of Proteins Being Disordered

Binding Cavities and Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

On the Origins of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Kinetic Advantage of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins in Coupled Folding–Binding Process: A Critical Assessment of the “Fly-Casting” Mechanism

Ligand clouds around protein clouds: a scenario of ligand binding with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Toward A Quantitative Theory of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Function

Identification of Intrinsic Disorder in Complexes from the Protein Data Bank

Inherent Relationships among Different Biophysical Prediction Methods for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Configurational Entropy of Folded Proteins and its Importance for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

A Comprehensive Ensemble Model for Comparing the Allosteric Effect of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Sequence Tendency for the Interaction Between Low-Complexity Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Conservation of Potentially Druggable Cavities in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions Between Two IDPs

The complexity of protein interactions unravelled from structural disorder

The Intrinsic Folding Mechanism Affects the Coupled Folding-Binding Process of Unfolded Proteins

Fine structures of intrinsically disordered proteins

Structural and Functional Relevance of Charge Based Transient Interactions inside Intrinsically Disordered Proteins