Abstract:Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are macromolecules, which in contrast to well-folded proteins, explore a large number of conformationally heterogeneous states. In this work, we investigate the conformational space of the disordered protein $\beta$-casein using Hamiltonian replica exchange atomistic molecular dynamics simulations in explicit water. The energy landscape contains a global minimum along with two shallow funnels. Employing static polymeric scaling laws separately for individual funnels, we find that they cannot be described by the same polymeric scaling exponent. Around the global minimum, the conformations are globular, whereas in the vicinity of local minima we recover coil-like scaling. To elucidate the implications of structural diversity on equilibrium dynamics, we initiate standard molecular dynamics simulations in the NVT ensemble with representative conformations from each funnel. Global and internal motions for different classes of trajectories show heterogeneous dynamics with globule to coil-like signatures. Thus, IDPs can behave as entirely different polymers in different regions of the conformational space.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **To understand the reasons why intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) exhibit different polymer behaviors in different conformational regions and their impact on equilibrium dynamics**. Specifically, the author explored the behavior of β - casein, an intrinsically disordered protein, in different regions of the energy landscape by studying its conformational space. The core problems of the paper are: 1. **Conformational heterogeneity**: IDPs can exhibit completely different polymer behaviors in different regions of energy minima, such as globular and coil - like structures. 2. **Static and dynamic scaling properties**: How do these different conformations affect the static and dynamic properties of IDPs, especially their performance in different conformational regions? 3. **Equilibrium dynamics**: What are the differences in the kinetic behaviors of IDPs in different conformational regions at equilibrium, for example, the characteristics of overall and internal motions? ### Main research content To answer these questions, the author carried out the following work: - **Molecular dynamics simulation**: Sampled the complete conformational ensemble of β - casein using explicit - solvent all - atom molecular dynamics simulation (HREMD). - **Free - energy - landscape analysis**: Constructed the free - energy landscape (FEL) through the radius of gyration ($R_g$) and solvent - accessible surface area (SASA), and discovered a global minimum and two shallow funnels. - **Conformational classification**: Classified the conformations into three categories, compact (C), intermediate (I), and extended (E), according to the probability density distribution of $R_g$. - **Static - scaling properties**: Measured the internal distance $d_{ij}$ in different conformational categories and calculated the Flory exponent (ν) to describe the compactness of the chain. - **Dynamic - scaling properties**: Analyzed the spectra of Rouse - mode amplitudes to study the internal structure and kinetic behavior in different conformational categories. ### Conclusions Through the above research, the author draws the following conclusions: - **Conformational diversity**: IDPs exhibit different polymer behaviors in different regions of energy minima, such as globular and coil - like structures. - **Static and dynamic heterogeneity**: IDPs in different conformational regions have different static and dynamic scaling properties, manifested as different Flory exponents and Rouse - mode - amplitude spectra. - **Differences in equilibrium - dynamics**: The kinetic behaviors of IDPs in different conformational regions are significantly different at equilibrium. For example, the compact conformation is more like a polymer sphere, while the extended conformation is more like a polymer coil. These findings are helpful for in - depth understanding of the functionality and aggregation morphology of IDPs and provide an important reference for future research.

Intrinsically disordered proteins can behave as different polymers across their conformational ensemble

Fine structures of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intramolecular Structural Heterogeneity altered by Long-range Contacts in an Intrinsically Disordered Protein

Disentangling folding from energetic traps in simulations of disordered proteins

Intrinsically Disordered Proteins at the Nano-scale

Sequence-Dependent Conformational Transitions of Disordered Proteins During Condensation

Design of intrinsically disordered protein variants with diverse structural properties

Configurational Entropy of Folded Proteins and its Importance for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Smoothing molecular interactions: The “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins

Sizes, conformational fluctuations, and SAXS profiles for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Do Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Possess High Specificity in Proteinprotein Interactions?

Conformational ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins and flexible multidomain proteins

Structural and Functional Relevance of Charge Based Transient Interactions inside Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Predicting Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: From Molecular Dynamics to Machine Learning

Conservation of Potentially Druggable Cavities in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Conformational ensembles of the human intrinsically disordered proteome

Ligand clouds around protein clouds: a scenario of ligand binding with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Binding Cavities and Druggability of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Inherent Relationships among Different Biophysical Prediction Methods for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Experimental methods to study the structure and dynamics of intrinsically disordered regions in proteins