Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Conformational ensembles of the human intrinsically disordered proteome

Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Conditional Folding in AlphaFoldDB

Direct prediction of intrinsically disordered protein conformational properties from sequences

On the potential of machine learning to examine the relationship between sequence, structure, dynamics and function of intrinsically disordered proteins

AlphaFold predictions on whole genomes at a glance

Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

The Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program

Predicting Conformational Ensembles of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: From Molecular Dynamics to Machine Learning

AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?

AlphaFold-Metainference: Prediction of Structural Ensembles of Disordered Proteins

Inherent Relationships among Different Biophysical Prediction Methods for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

An Overview of Predictors for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins over 2010–2014

A deep learning method for predicting interactions for intrinsically disordered regions of proteins

Disentangling the CHAOS of intrinsic disorder in human proteins

Do sequence neighbours of intrinsically disordered regions promote structural flexibility in intrinsically disordered proteins?

On the Origins of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Computational Prediction of Protein Intrinsically Disordered Region Related Interactions and Functions

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Computational Methods to Investigate Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and their Complexes