Abstract:AlphaFold2 (AF2) and RoseTTaFold (RF) have revolutionized structural biology, serving as highly reliable and effective methods for predicting protein structures. This article explores their impact and limitations, focusing on their integration into experimental pipelines and their application in diverse protein classes, including membrane proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), and oligomers. In experimental pipelines, AF2 models help X-ray crystallography in resolving the phase problem, while complementarity with mass spectrometry and NMR data enhances structure determination and protein flexibility prediction. Predicting the structure of membrane proteins remains challenging for both AF2 and RF due to difficulties in capturing conformational ensembles and interactions with the membrane. Improvements in incorporating membrane-specific features and predicting the structural effect of mutations are crucial. For intrinsically disordered proteins, AF2's confidence score (pLDDT) serves as a competitive disorder predictor, but integrative approaches including molecular dynamics (MD) simulations or hydrophobic cluster analyses are advocated for accurate dynamics representation. AF2 and RF show promising results for oligomeric models, outperforming traditional docking methods, with AlphaFold-Multimer showing improved performance. However, some caveats remain in particular for membrane proteins. Real-life examples demonstrate AF2's predictive capabilities in unknown protein structures, but models should be evaluated for their agreement with experimental data. Furthermore, AF2 models can be used complementarily with MD simulations. In this Perspective, we propose a "wish list" for improving deep-learning-based protein folding prediction models, including using experimental data as constraints and modifying models with binding partners or post-translational modifications. Additionally, a meta-tool for ranking and suggesting composite models is suggested, driving future advancements in this rapidly evolving field.

The Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

AI-Based Protein Structure Prediction in Drug Discovery: Impacts and Challenges

Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information

Proteins with alternative folds reveal blind spots in AlphaFold-based protein structure prediction

Protein structure prediction in the era of AI: Challenges and limitations when applying to in silico force spectroscopy

Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins

More than just pattern recognition: Prediction of uncommon protein structure features by AI methods

AlphaFold predictions on whole genomes at a glance

AI-Predicted Protein Deformation Encodes Energy Landscape Perturbation

AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold

Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Conditional Folding in AlphaFoldDB

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning

ESMFold Hallucinates Native-Like Protein Sequences

Severe deviation in protein fold prediction by advanced AI: a case study

AlphaFold2 knows some protein folding principles

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

Protein 3D Structure Identification by AlphaFold: a Physics-Based Prediction or Recognition Using Huge Databases?