Abstract:This study explored the difference between predicted structure confidence and disorder detection in protein, focusing on regions with undefined structures detected as missing segments in X-ray crystallography and Cryo-EM data. Recognizing the importance of these ‘unstructured’ regions for protein functionality, we examined the alignment of numerous protein sequences with their resolved or not structures. The research utilized a comprehensive PDB dataset, classifying residues into ‘modeled’, ‘hard missing’ and ‘soft missing’ based on their visibility in structural data. By analysis, key features were firstly determined, including confidence score pLDDT from Al-phaFold2, an advanced AI-based tool, and IUPred, a conventional disorder prediction method. Our analysis reveals that "hard missing" residues often reside in low-confidence regions, but are not exclusively associated with disorder predictions. It was assessed how effectively individual key features can distinguish between structured and unstructured data, as well as the potential benefits of combining these features for advanced machine learning applications. This approach aims to uncover varying correlations across different experimental methodologies in the latest structural data. By analyzing the relationships between predictions and experimental structures, we can more effectively identify structural targets within proteins, guiding experimental designs toward areas of potential functional significance, whether they exhibit high stability or crucial unstructured regions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the effectiveness of AlphaFold in predicting missing residues and structurally disordered regions in proteins. Specifically, the research focuses on the undefined structural regions detected in X - ray crystallography and cryo - electron microscopy data, which are often referred to as "hard - missing" and "soft - missing" residues. Through the analysis of these regions, the research aims to: 1. **Understand the differences between predicted structural confidence and disorder detection**: Explore the relationship between the confidence scores (such as pLDDT) predicted by AlphaFold and traditional disorder prediction methods (such as IUPred), especially in the disordered regions of proteins. 2. **Classify protein residues**: Classify protein residues into three categories: "modeling", "hard - missing", and "soft - missing", based on their visibility in structural data. 3. **Evaluate the effectiveness of key features**: Analyze the performance of key features such as pLDDT and IUPred in distinguishing between ordered and disordered data, and explore the potential of combining these features for advanced machine - learning applications. 4. **Reveal the correlations between different experimental methods**: By analyzing the relationship between prediction results and experimental structures, reveal the different performances of different experimental methods (such as X - ray crystallography, single - particle analysis, and tomography) in the latest structural data. 5. **Guide experimental design**: Provide guidance for experimental design by more effectively identifying structural targets in proteins, especially those proteins with high stability and critical disordered regions. Overall, this research aims to improve the understanding of protein structure and function through a comprehensive analysis of AlphaFold's prediction results and experimental data, especially for those regions where the structure is difficult to determine.

Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins

The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins

Assessing structure and disorder prediction tools for de novo emerged proteins in the age of machine learning

AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?

Protein complex structure modeling by cross-modal alignment between cryo-EM maps and protein sequences

AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information

The Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program

In Silico Structural Analysis Exploring Conformational Folding of Protein Variants in Alzheimer's Disease

A Perspective on the Prospective Use of AI in Protein Structure Prediction

Revealing missing protein-ligand interactions using AlphaFold predictions

AlphaFold-assisted structure determination of a bacterial protein of unknown function using X-ray and electron crystallography

High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement

Enhancing cryo-EM structure prediction with DeepTracer and AlphaFold2 integration

Assessing Structures and Conformational Ensembles of Apo and Holo Protein States Using Randomized Alanine Sequence Scanning Combined with Shallow Subsampling in AlphaFold2 : Insights and Lessons from Predictions of Functional Allosteric Conformations

Random, de novo, and conserved proteins: How structure and disorder predictors perform differently

Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

From interaction networks to interfaces, scanning intrinsically disordered regions using AlphaFold2

AI-Based Protein Structure Prediction in Drug Discovery: Impacts and Challenges

Intrinsic Protein Disorder and Conditional Folding in AlphaFoldDB

AI told you so: navigating protein structure prediction in the era of machine learning