Abstract:SAT solvers are indispensable in formal verification for hardware and software with many important applications. CDCL is the most widely used framework for modern SAT solvers, and restart is an essential technique of CDCL. When restarting, CDCL solvers cancel the current variable assignment while maintaining the branching order, variable phases, and learnt clauses. This type of restart is referred to as warm restart in this paper. Although different restart policies have been studied, there is no study on whether such information should be kept after restarts. This work addresses this question and finds some interesting observations. This paper indicates that under this popular warm restart scheme, there is a substantial variation in run-time with different randomized initial orders and phases, which motivates us to forget some learned information periodically to prevent being stuck in a disadvantageous search space. We propose a new type of restart called cold restart, which differs from previous restarts by forgetting some of the learned information. Experiments show that modern CDCL solvers can benefit from periodically conducting cold restarts. Based on the analysis of the cold-restart strategies, we develop a parallel SAT solver. Both the sequential and parallel versions of cold restart are more suitable for satisfiable instances, which suggests that existing CDCL heuristics for information management should be revised if one hopes to construct a satisfiable-oriented SAT solver.

Towards Ultra Rapid Restarts

Restart Strategy Selection using Machine Learning Techniques

Revisiting Restarts of CDCL: Should the Search Information be Preserved?

A Warm Restart Strategy for Solving Sudoku by Sparse Optimization Methods

A Reinforcement Learning based Reset Policy for CDCL SAT Solvers

Life span of SAT techniques

Restarting Algorithms: Sometimes there is Free Lunch

An Iterative Path-Breaking Approach with Mutation and Restart Strategies for the MAX-SAT Problem

Ensemble-based Prediction of SAT Search Behaviour

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

Guiding High-Performance SAT Solvers with Unsat-Core Predictions

SATbed: A Configurable Environment for Reliable Performance Experiments with SAT Instance Classes and Algorithms

Quantum Backtracking in Qrisp Applied to Sudoku Problems

From Gameplay to Symbolic Reasoning: Learning SAT Solver Heuristics in the Style of Alpha(Go) Zero

On the Glucose SAT Solver

Mean-performance of Sharp Restart II: Inequality Roadmap

SAT Competition 2016: Recent Developments

A Time Leap Challenge for SAT Solving

Using deep learning to construct stochastic local search SAT solvers with performance bounds

Symbiosis of Search and Heuristics for Random 3-SAT

Avoiding Redundant Restarts in Multimodal Global Optimization