Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

Symbiosis of Search and Heuristics for Random 3-SAT

Counting-Based Search: Branching Heuristics for Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Neural heuristics for SAT solving

EXPLORATION OF HARD TO SOLVE 3-SAT PROBLEMS

Guided Search And A Faster Deterministic Algorithm For 3-Sat

Using automatic programming to generate state-of-the-art algorithms for random 3-SAT

Exploring search space trees using an adapted version of Monte Carlo tree search for combinatorial optimization problems

More efficient stochastic local search for satisfiability

Ensemble-based Prediction of SAT Search Behaviour

Intelligent search strategies based on adaptive Constraint Handling Rules

Using deep learning to construct stochastic local search SAT solvers with performance bounds

Rational Deployment of CSP Heuristics

Solving SAT Problem by Heuristic Polarity Decision-Making Algorithm

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

A New Heuristic Search Technique-Algorithm SA

Evolving difficult SAT instances thanks to local search

UNSAT Solver Synthesis via Monte Carlo Forest Search

AutoSAT: Automatically Optimize SAT Solvers via Large Language Models

Phase transition for Local Search on planted SAT

Improving probability selection based weights for satisfiability problems

A Folding Strategy for SAT Solvers Based on Shannon's Expansion Theorem