Abstract:Boolean satisfiability (SAT) problems are routinely solved by SAT solvers in real-life applications, yet solving time can vary drastically between solvers for the same instance. This has motivated research into machine learning models that can predict, for a given SAT instance, which solver to select among several options. Existing SAT solver selection methods all rely on some hand-picked instance features, which are costly to compute and ignore the structural information in SAT graphs. In this paper we present GraSS, a novel approach for automatic SAT solver selection based on tripartite graph representations of instances and a heterogeneous graph neural network (GNN) model. While GNNs have been previously adopted in other SAT-related tasks, they do not incorporate any domain-specific knowledge and ignore the runtime variation introduced by different clause orders. We enrich the graph representation with domain-specific decisions, such as novel node feature design, positional encodings for clauses in the graph, a GNN architecture tailored to our tripartite graphs and a runtime-sensitive loss function. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that this combination of raw representations and domain-specific choices leads to improvements in runtime for a pool of seven state-of-the-art solvers on both an industrial circuit design benchmark, and on instances from the 20-year Anniversary Track of the 2022 SAT Competition.

On the Glucose SAT Solver

Guiding High-Performance SAT Solvers with Unsat-Core Predictions

GpuShareSat: a SAT solver using the GPU for clause sharing

FPGAs (Can Get Some) SATisfaction

HordeSat: A Massively Parallel Portfolio SAT Solver

GraSS: Combining Graph Neural Networks with Expert Knowledge for SAT Solver Selection

Accelerating an FPGA-Based SAT Solver by Software and Hardware Co-design

G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networks

SAT Competition 2016: Recent Developments

SKI-SAT: A CMOS-compatible Hardware for Solving SAT Problems

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

A survey of SAT solver

Life span of SAT techniques

A Time Leap Challenge for SAT Solving

SAT Heritage: a community-driven effort for archiving, building and running more than thousand SAT solvers

SatIn: Hardware for Boolean Satisfiability Inference

EXPLORATION OF HARD TO SOLVE 3-SAT PROBLEMS

Using deep learning to construct stochastic local search SAT solvers with performance bounds

An Improved GPU-Based SAT Model Counter

FYalSAT: High-Throughput Stochastic Local Search K-SAT Solver on FPGA

Cellular Genetic Algorithms And Local Search For 3-Sat Problem On Graphic Hardware