Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

From Total Assignment Enumeration to Modern SAT Solver

Revisiting Restarts of CDCL: Should the Search Information be Preserved?

Hybrid Sat Solver Considering Circuit Observability

Solving Dynamic 3-SAT Formula: an Empirical Study.

An Efficient Resolution Based Algorithm for SAT

A Randomized Diversification Strategy for Solving Satisfiability Problem with Long Clauses.

Improving abcdSAT by At-Least-One Recently Used Clause Management Strategy

EDA-Driven Preprocessing for SAT Solving

SAT v CSP

Disjoint Projected Enumeration for SAT and SMT without Blocking Clauses

General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problems

More Efficient Two-Mode Stochastic Local Search for Random 3-Satisfiability

Integrating Conflict Driven Clause Learning to Local Search

SATformer: Transformer-Based UNSAT Core Learning

Enhance SAT Conflict Analysis for Model Checking

Further Explanations on "SAT Requires Exhaustive Search"

A Deep Dive into Conflict Generating Decisions

A Resolution-Based Interactive Proof System for UNSAT

Boosting branch-and-bound MaxSAT solvers with clause learning