Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

From Total Assignment Enumeration to Modern SAT Solver

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

Disjoint Projected Enumeration for SAT and SMT without Blocking Clauses

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problems

RTSAT: A Hybrid Satisfiability Solver for RTL Circuits

EDA-Driven Preprocessing for SAT Solving

Integrating Advanced Reasoning into a SAT Solver.

DeepSAT: An EDA-Driven Learning Framework for SAT

DNLSAT: A Dynamic Variable Ordering MCSAT Framework for Nonlinear Real Arithmetic

Extending Modern SAT Solvers for Enumerating All Models

A survey of SAT solver

Parallelizing SMT Solving: Lazy Decomposition and Conciliation

Hybrid Sat Solver Considering Circuit Observability

Improving abcdSAT by At-Least-One Recently Used Clause Management Strategy

An Eager Satisfiability Modulo Theories Solver for Algebraic Datatypes

clauseSMT: A NLSAT-Based Clause-Level Framework for Satisfiability Modulo Nonlinear Real Arithmetic Theory

Who Verifies the Verifiers? A Computer-Checked Implementation of the DPLL Algorithm in Dafny

An Efficient Resolution Based Algorithm for SAT

Advanced Tools and Methods for Treewidth-Based Problem Solving -- Extended Abstract

An Analog SAT Solver Based on a Deterministic Dynamical System: (invited Paper)