Abstract:The past three decades have witnessed notable success in designing efficient SAT solvers, with modern solvers capable of solving industrial benchmarks containing millions of variables in just a few seconds. The success of modern SAT solvers owes to the widely-used CDCL algorithm, which lacks comprehensive theoretical investigation. Furthermore, it has been observed that CDCL solvers still struggle to deal with specific classes of benchmarks comprising only hundreds of variables, which contrasts with their widespread use in real-world applications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to uncover the inner workings of these seemingly weak yet powerful black boxes. In this paper, we present a first step towards this goal by introducing an approach called CausalSAT, which employs causal reasoning to gain insights into the functioning of modern SAT solvers. CausalSAT initially generates observational data from the execution of SAT solvers and learns a structured graph representing the causal relationships between the components of a SAT solver. Subsequently, given a query such as whether a clause with low literals blocks distance (LBD) has a higher clause utility, CausalSAT calculates the causal effect of LBD on clause utility and provides an answer to the question. We use CausalSAT to quantitatively verify hypotheses previously regarded as "rules of thumb" or empirical findings such as the query above. Moreover, CausalSAT can address previously unexplored questions, like which branching heuristic leads to greater clause utility in order to study the relationship between branching and clause management. Experimental evaluations using practical benchmarks demonstrate that CausalSAT effectively fits the data, verifies four "rules of thumb", and provides answers to three questions closely related to implementing modern solvers.

Extending Modern SAT Solvers for Enumerating All Models

On Enumerating Short Projected Models

Disjoint Projected Enumeration for SAT and SMT without Blocking Clauses

Disjoint Partial Enumeration without Blocking Clauses

Submodel Enumeration for CTL Is Hard

Model enumeration in propositional circumscription via unsatisfiable core analysis

On SAT Models Enumeration in Itemset Mining

A new approach to model counting

Minimal Model Counting via Knowledge Compilation

From Total Assignment Enumeration to Modern SAT Solver

Distribution-Aware Sampling and Weighted Model Counting for SAT

General Method for Solving Four Types of SAT Problems

BIRD: Engineering an Efficient CNF-XOR SAT Solver and Its Applications to Approximate Model Counting

CCDD: A Tractable Representation for Model Counting and Uniform Sampling

Complete SAT Solver Based on Set Theory.

Explaining SAT Solving Using Causal Reasoning

Between SAT and UNSAT: The Fundamental Difference in CDCL SAT

Transformer-based Machine Learning for Fast SAT Solvers and Logic Synthesis

Approximate Model Counting, Sparse XOR Constraints and Minimum Distance

Learning Branching Heuristics for Propositional Model Counting

Function synthesis for maximizing model counting