Abstract:Abstract Recently, a new set of parameters produced by the Beckman-Coulter’s GEN’S, LH500, LH750 and the latest LH780 automated blood counters, derived from leukocyte and red cell’s morphological data by means of the VCS technology are available and can be printed as research data together with the leukocyte differential and reticulocyte analysis. With the use of these Research Population Data (RPD) parameters several recent publications have shown their usefulness for the diagnosis of malaria (Fourcade et al), sepsis (Chaves ), apoptosis detection (Lab hem 2005) and the diagnosis and differentiation of lymphoptoliferative disorders (Silva M et al) In order to evaluate the analytical behaviour of these newly described red blood cell and leukocyte morphological parameters in routine bood samples and in the Beckman-Coulter’s calibration and control 5C, we conducted a study to evaluate the paramters’ precision and performance during short and long term sample’s storage: Precision: 10 samples from normal individuals were analyzed 10 times and the CV for each parameter was calculated Short term stability stability at 4C and 22C: 5 normal samples were evaluated from the time of blood drawing until 5 hours later, both at room temperature (22C) and at 4 C Long term stability at 4C: 15 normal samples were evaluated at various times after blood drawing, from 4 hours (which was found to be the best time for sample analysis in the short term stability study, above) up to 77 hours after blood withdrawal. Control and Calibration with 5C: We evaluated the performance of the research parameters in the 5C by running the same batch of 5C control in 5 different counters from 4 different centers, comparing the results with those from 5 normal individuals Stability in a period of time: We have evaluated every week during two months 15 normal samples, recording the temperature and the avergae of all RPD values. RESULTS Precission: The CV% for the Mean Volume, Conductivity and Scatter of the different leukocyte types was always less than 1%, with an average of 0,6%. The CV% for the Standard Deviation of Volume, Conductivity and Scatter varied between 2.45% and 7.7%, wit an average of 4.9%. The CV% of any SD always being higher than the primary parameter. Short term stability: We observed no significant differences between samples kept at 4C and 22C during the first 5 hours after blood drawing. During the first two hours, however, minor fluctuations in results occurred, always <5%, being preferable to test the samples after blood stabilization, between 2 and 5 hours after withdrawal. Long term stability: The stability of the research parameters after 9 hours is best when the samples are kept at 4C, but the differences are not clinically significant up to 17 hours and, for some parameters, up to 24 hours after blood drawing. The comparison of the RPD research parameters from normal samples and from the Beckman’s 5C control showed good correlation in the different counters and the different centers. When the results from the 5C were higher or lower, the results from the normal samples were concordantly higher or lower respectively, The correlation coefficient was 0.98 for the Mean Volume and 0.92 for the Mean Conductivity The Stability of RPD values was acceptable during the period evaluated (2 m.)with changes lower than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study show that from the analytical stand point, precission, stability and possibility of calibration, these Research Population data are equivalent to those of other laboratory tests performed by modern instruments.

B-112 Regression Analysis Techniques for Assessing Calibration Reproducibility Within and Between Instruments. A Practical Example with Blood Ca2+ Assayed with Two cobas® b 221Analyzers

A-101 Is That Unexpected? Education on Handling Real World Complications with Tightly Controlled Analytes During Method Evaluation

College of American Pathologists Quality Cross Check —Chemistry and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring as a tool for biannual instrument correlations

Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications

Method comparison between Alinity hq and Sysmex XT-4000i in an emergency laboratory

Impact of regression modeling on the assessment and harmonization of a point-of-care analyzer and commercial laboratory analyzer for feline plasma biochemistry testing

Evaluation of agreement between a noninvasive method for real-time measurement of critical blood values with a standard point-of-care device

The Study of the Influence of the Reagent and Calibrator on the Traceability in Enzyme Detection

B-020 Study of Method Intercomparison between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for T4L, β-HCG Total, and PSA Total

A-130 Intercomparison of Methods between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

B-029 Comparison of Electrolyte Measurement Using Laboratory Autoanalyzer and Blood Gas Analyzer

Successful Performance of Laboratory Investigations with Blood Glucose Meters Employing a Dynamic Electrochemistry-Based Correction Algorithm Is Dependent on Careful Sample Handling

Analytical Features of the New Red Blood Cell and White Blood Cell LH750 Research Population Data.

A model for managing quality control for a network of clinical chemistry instruments measuring the same analyte

A-118 Sigma Metric Performance of Chemistry Assays on 4 Instrument Systems

Analysis of the comparability of the results of 26 serum biochemical indicators in two different biochemical analysis systems

Establishing hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia interference limits for body fluid chemistry analytes measured on the Roche cobas instrument

Calibrate Different Hematology Analyzers in one Laboratory Using Fresh Blood Sample Combination of Commercial Calibrator

Verification of examination procedures for 72 biochemical parameters on the atellica® clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzers

Continued harmonization of the international normalized ratio across a large laboratory network: Evidence of sustained low interlaboratory variation and bias after a change in instrumentation

Comparison of the results' consistency of 3 automated coagulation analyzers for coagulation items