Abstract:BackgroundA common activity in clinical laboratories is performance evaluations. Given the importance for a new analyzer being put into clinical use, this exercise typically requires extensive preparation with significant time and resources invested to bring on new instrumentation. During early adoption, studies examined real-world performance and comparability of the Atellica® CI Analyzer (Atellica CI) to clinically used instruments. Precision, linearity, and method comparison (MC) studies, conducted in accordance with CLSI protocols, were completed at several locations installing new instruments to examine the analytical performance of common clinical laboratory assays. This work examines the impact of using only unmodified specimens to verify performance during method comparison for tightly controlled biological analytes like electrolytes and illustrates the impact of the tested sample range on regression analysis.MethodsTesting was completed using unmodified, de-identified, remnant patient serum specimens. The MC studies for these electrolytes were completed over multiple days using single replicates from at least 40 individual specimens, on two instruments, the Atellica CI and the Dimension® EXL in accordance with CLSI EP09-3A. The effect of sample range on regression was demonstrated through data restriction and inclusion of modified sample results within the data analysis. Data analysis was completed using Analyse-it for Microsoft Excel (version 6.15.4).ResultsRepresentative method comparison data for sodium, chloride, and potassium found slope differences were more pronounced when sample concentrations were more limited. Individual assay slopes were determined using Deming linear regression model and comparisons between restricted samples show the effects of sample range on regression and correlation parameters.ConclusionsUnderstanding the relationship between sample range and regression analysis is helpful to illustrate an important fundamental concept of method comparison. These examples illustrate the importance in covering as much of the analytical measuring interval as possible and the impact on regression analysis when samples are narrowly grouped.

A-130 Intercomparison of Methods between Atellica Solution® and CI® Analyzers for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

A-008 Verification of Interchangeability of Results for High-Sensitivity Troponin (TNIH) Between Atellica Solution® and Atellica CI® Analyzers

B-279 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Two Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

A-034 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Five Chemistry Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

A-053 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Atellica CH Prealbumin and β2-Microglobulin Chemistry Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

A-028 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance Iron3, Vitamin B12, and Homocysteine Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

A-030 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Two Reproductive Endocrinology Related Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

A-029 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Four Assays Used for Diabetes on the Atellica CI Analyzer

B-045 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Three Sepsis Related Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

B-029 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Creatine Kinase, Lactate dehydrogenase L-P, Myoglobin Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

Comparison of measurements for ALT and AST among four domestic reference laboratories

B-340 Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of Three Major Immunoglobulins Assays on the Atellica CI Analyzer

Establishment and evaluation of the reference methods of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase

A-101 Is That Unexpected? Education on Handling Real World Complications with Tightly Controlled Analytes During Method Evaluation

Method comparison between Alinity hq and Sysmex XT-4000i in an emergency laboratory

Commutability Assessment of Candidate External Quality Assessment Materials for Aminotransferase Activity Measurements Based on Different Approaches in China

Research on the comparability of AST results by improved reference method

Evaluation of matrix effects for serum ALT and AST measurements

Analytical performance evaluation of a new integrated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer

Application of reference method in the standardization for the determination of alanine aminotransferase

Evaluation of the Comparability of Wantai Wan200+ Instrument with Routine Laboratory Assays for 21 Different Analytes