Abstract:Our memories of other people shape how we interact with them. Yet, even when we forget exactly what others said or did, we often remember impressions that capture a general gist of their behavior-whether they were forthright, friendly, or funny. Drawing on fuzzy trace theory, we propose two modes of social impression formation: impressions formed based on ordinal gist ("more competent," "less competent") or categorical gist ("competent," "incompetent"). In turn, we propose that people gravitate toward the simplest representation available and that different modes of memory have distinct consequences for social decisions. Specifically, ordinal impressions lead people to make decisions based on an individual's standing relative to others, whereas categorical impressions lead people to make decisions based on discrete classifications that interpret behavior. In four experiments, participants learned about two groups of individuals who differed in their competence (Studies 1a, 2, and 3) or generosity (Study 1b). When participants encoded impressions as ordinal rankings, they preferred to hire or help a relatively good target from a low-performing group over a relatively bad target from a high-performing group, even though both targets behaved identically and accuracy was incentivized. However, when participants could use categorical boundaries to interpret behavior, this preference was eliminated. In a final experiment, changing the category participants used to encode others' generosity changed their impressions, even when accounting for memory for verbatim details. This work links social impressions to theories of mental representation in memory and judgment, highlighting how distinct representations support divergent patterns of social decision-making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Are they like us or are we like them? Applying the principle of contrast modeling to social identity

The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion

Moving Morality Beyond the In-Group: Liberals and Conservatives Show Differences on Group-Framed Moral Foundations and These Differences Mediate the Relationships to Perceived Bias and Threat

Ideology: Psychological Similarities and Differences Across the Ideological Spectrum Reexamined

Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection

Competition, Cooperation, and the Effects of Others on Me.

Culturally-Guided Beliefs about Opposing Categories and Their Consequences for Action: the Case of Cooperation and Competition

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Overconfidence and Prejudice

The moral foundations of illusory correlation

Attitude networks as intergroup realities: Using network-modelling to research attitude-identity relationships in polarized political contexts

Two modes of social impressions and their effects on choice.

The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time

Emphasizing Similarities Between Politically Opposed Groups and Their Influence in Perceptions of the Political Opposition: Evidence From Five Experiments

Friend or Foe: A Review and Synthesis of Computational Models of the Identity Labeling Problem

To thine own self be true? Clarifying the effects of identity discrepancies on psychological distress and emotions

The contingent reputational benefits of selective exposure to partisan information.

Cognitive complexity explains processing asymmetry in judgments of similarity versus difference

Implicit and Explicit Illusory Correlation as a Function of Political Ideology

The many faces of compensation: The similarities and differences between social and facial models of perception

I Am Against Us? Unpacking Cultural Differences in Ingroup Favoritism Via Dialecticism.