Abstract:We used a multi-dimensional framework to assess current stereotypes of men and women. Specifically, we sought to determine (1) how men and women are characterized by male and female raters, (2) how men and women characterize themselves, and (3) the degree of convergence between self-characterizations and charcterizations of one's gender group. In an experimental study, 628 U.S. male and female raters described men, women, or themselves on scales representing multiple dimensions of the two defining features of gender stereotypes, agency and communality: assertiveness, independence, instrumental competence, leadership competence (agency dimensions), and concern for others, sociability and emotional sensitivity (communality dimensions). Results indicated that stereotypes about communality persist and were equally prevalent for male and female raters, but agency characterizations were more complex. Male raters generally descibed women as being less agentic than men and as less agentic than female raters described them. However, female raters differentiated among agency dimensions and described women as less assertive than men but as equally independent and leadership competent. Both male and female raters rated men and women equally high on instrumental competence. Gender stereotypes were also evident in self-characterizations, with female raters rating themselves as less agentic than male raters and male raters rating themselves as less communal than female raters, although there were exceptions (no differences in instrumental competence, independence, and sociability self-ratings for men and women). Comparisons of self-ratings and ratings of men and women in general indicated that women tended to characterize themselves in more stereotypic terms - as less assertive and less competent in leadership - than they characterized others in their gender group. Men, in contrast, characterized themselves in less stereotypic terms - as more communal. Overall, our results show that a focus on facets of agency and communality can provide deeper insights about stereotype content than a focus on overall agency and communality.

The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion

Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content

Warmth and competence in your face! Visual encoding of stereotype content

How Orthogonal Are the Big Two of Social Perception? On the Curvilinear Relation Between Agency and Communion

The neural representation of stereotype content

Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences

Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: observations of groups' roles shape stereotypes.

People perception and stereotype-based responding: task context matters

Predicting Human Behavior Toward Members of Different Social Groups.

The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves

Agency-communion and interest in prosocial behavior: social motives for assimilation and contrast explain sociocultural inconsistencies

The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

Stereotypes of Social Groups in Mainland China in Terms of Warmth and Competence: Evidence from a Large Undergraduate Sample

Group reciprocity and the evolution of stereotyping

Changes and stagnation in contemporary racial stereotypes

Are they like us or are we like them? Applying the principle of contrast modeling to social identity

System-justifying ideologies moderate status = Competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation

Culture and group perception: dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups

Affective meanings of stereotyped social groups in cross-cultural comparison

A systematic literature review of the stereotype content model in the fields of psychology and marketing: main themes examined in the literature and an agenda for future research in marketing

Conspiracy Theories: Groups, Ideology, and Status as Three Distinct Bases for Expressions in Society