Abstract:There has been significant debate recently around how best to name the newest healthcare profession to seek regulation under the umbrella of the Professional Standards Authority (PSA). Originally called physician assistant (PA), it was changed to physician associate in 2013 by the UK Association of Physician Assistants, which was the professional body for PAs at that time. This change was backed by the government as the Department for Health and Social Care felt the term 'assistant' would hold the profession back from becoming regulated.1 After the death of a constituent who had been misdiagnosed by a PA mistakenly identified as a GP, Barbara Keeley MP noted on the floor of the House of Commons that 'The title of the role ... sounds extremely grand, even grander than a general practitioner' .2 This was quickly followed by the British Medical Association's call for a reversion of the PA title from 'associate' to 'assistant'.3 More recently, during approval of the Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order in the House of Lords, Baroness Finlay of Llandaff tabled an amendment expressing the House's regret that the title would not 'revert to the more accurate "physicians' assistant".' 4 She noted that 'patients seen by a physician associate sometimes think that they have seen a doctor. The term ... gets muddled with the ... associate specialist doctor, who often has years of experience' ,4 going on to ask whether physician associate, which is so misleading, would become a protected title after the passing of the order, as no medical titles are protected. The Minister, Lord Markham, did not address this question directly in his response, but ...

Physician associates: BMA launches legal action against GMC

Physician associates: BMA backs family's legal challenge to GMC over "blurring of lines"

Physician associates: Doctors raise alarm over legislation to allow GMC regulation

Physician associates: GMC calls for views on regulation

Physician associates: Parliament was "misadvised" on RCP's support for regulation, fellows say

Physician associates: GPs vote to phase out "fundamentally unsafe" role in general practice

Physician associates should not be regulated by the General Medical Council, and doctors should tell it so

There is a role for physician associates in the NHS

"A whirlwind of anecdotes"? The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges seems unconvinced by evidence of concerns about physician associates

Physician associates: NHS leader accuses BMA of getting discussion wrong

Physician associates: a pause in rollout is needed

Doctors are under attack from all sides, BMA chair tells annual meeting

Why the fuss about physician associates?

RCGP calls for immediate freeze on recruitment of physician associates

Helen Salisbury: Blurring the boundaries of the medical profession

Helen Salisbury: Ensuring the safety of physician associates' practice

Job titles in health care should be in service of patient safety, not status elevation

Helen Salisbury: Physician associates have no role in general practice

Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates—not false promises

Helen Salisbury: Risk and responsibility when working with physician associates

Are physician associates higher risk than other healthcare professionals?