Abstract:Like other health care systems, the National Health Service (NHS) in England has looked to new staffing configurations faced with medical staff shortages and rising costs. One solution has been to employ physician associates (PAs). PAs are trained in the medical model to assess, diagnose and commence treatment under the supervision of a physician. This paper explores the perceived effects on professional boundaries and relationships of introducing this completely new professional group. It draws on data from a study, completed in 2014, which examined the contribution of PAs working in general practice. Data were gathered at macro, meso and micro levels of the health care system. At the macro and meso level data were from policy documents, interviews with civil servants, senior members of national medical and nursing organisations, as well as regional level NHS managers (n = 25). At the micro level data came from interviews with General Practitioners, nurse practitioners and practice staff (n = 30) as well as observation of clinical and professional meetings. Analysis was both inductive and also framed by the existing theories of a dynamic system of professions. It is argued that professional boundaries become malleable and subject to negotiation at the micro level of service delivery. Stratification within professional groups created differing responses between those working at macro, meso and micro levels of the system; from acceptance to hostility in the face of a new and potentially competing, occupational group. Overarching this state agency was the requirement to underpin legislatively the shifts in jurisdictional boundaries, such as prescribing required for vertical substitution for some of the work of doctors.

Helen Salisbury: Ensuring the safety of physician associates' practice

Helen Salisbury: Physician associates have no role in general practice

Helen Salisbury: Risk and responsibility when working with physician associates

Physician associates: Parliament was "misadvised" on RCP's support for regulation, fellows say

There is a role for physician associates in the NHS

Physician associates: a pause in rollout is needed

Physician associate deployment in primary care: running before walking

"A whirlwind of anecdotes"? The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges seems unconvinced by evidence of concerns about physician associates

Why the fuss about physician associates?

Physician associates and RCGP policy — some plain speaking

"PA mess" is a combination of self-interest and protectionism

Helen Salisbury: Blurring the boundaries of the medical profession

Physician associates: GPs vote to phase out "fundamentally unsafe" role in general practice

Concerns over physician associates are missing the wood for the trees

Physician associates are integral to our practice

Are physician associates higher risk than other healthcare professionals?

Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates—not false promises

Physician associates should not be regulated by the General Medical Council, and doctors should tell it so

Dark days for the Royal College of Physicians of London

In praise of physician associates

Physician associates in primary health care in England: A challenge to professional boundaries?