Abstract:Like other health care systems, the National Health Service (NHS) in England has looked to new staffing configurations faced with medical staff shortages and rising costs. One solution has been to employ physician associates (PAs). PAs are trained in the medical model to assess, diagnose and commence treatment under the supervision of a physician. This paper explores the perceived effects on professional boundaries and relationships of introducing this completely new professional group. It draws on data from a study, completed in 2014, which examined the contribution of PAs working in general practice. Data were gathered at macro, meso and micro levels of the health care system. At the macro and meso level data were from policy documents, interviews with civil servants, senior members of national medical and nursing organisations, as well as regional level NHS managers (n = 25). At the micro level data came from interviews with General Practitioners, nurse practitioners and practice staff (n = 30) as well as observation of clinical and professional meetings. Analysis was both inductive and also framed by the existing theories of a dynamic system of professions. It is argued that professional boundaries become malleable and subject to negotiation at the micro level of service delivery. Stratification within professional groups created differing responses between those working at macro, meso and micro levels of the system; from acceptance to hostility in the face of a new and potentially competing, occupational group. Overarching this state agency was the requirement to underpin legislatively the shifts in jurisdictional boundaries, such as prescribing required for vertical substitution for some of the work of doctors.

Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates—not false promises

Why the fuss about physician associates?

Concerns over physician associates are missing the wood for the trees

There is a role for physician associates in the NHS

Physician associates: a pause in rollout is needed

"A whirlwind of anecdotes"? The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges seems unconvinced by evidence of concerns about physician associates

Physician associates: NHS leader accuses BMA of getting discussion wrong

In praise of physician associates

Partha Kar: Leng's review of physician and anaesthesia associates is welcome—with guarded optimism

Are physician associates higher risk than other healthcare professionals?

The expansion of physician associates in primary care risks alienating an already ailing GP workforce

Physician associates: Doctors raise alarm over legislation to allow GMC regulation

Physician associates: Parliament was "misadvised" on RCP's support for regulation, fellows say

Physician associate deployment in primary care: running before walking

Physician associates should not be regulated by the General Medical Council, and doctors should tell it so

Physician associates in primary health care in England: A challenge to professional boundaries?

Physician associates are integral to our practice

Physician associates and RCGP policy — some plain speaking

"PA mess" is a combination of self-interest and protectionism

Helen Salisbury: Physician associates have no role in general practice

Job titles in health care should be in service of patient safety, not status elevation