Abstract:Like other health care systems, the National Health Service (NHS) in England has looked to new staffing configurations faced with medical staff shortages and rising costs. One solution has been to employ physician associates (PAs). PAs are trained in the medical model to assess, diagnose and commence treatment under the supervision of a physician. This paper explores the perceived effects on professional boundaries and relationships of introducing this completely new professional group. It draws on data from a study, completed in 2014, which examined the contribution of PAs working in general practice. Data were gathered at macro, meso and micro levels of the health care system. At the macro and meso level data were from policy documents, interviews with civil servants, senior members of national medical and nursing organisations, as well as regional level NHS managers (n = 25). At the micro level data came from interviews with General Practitioners, nurse practitioners and practice staff (n = 30) as well as observation of clinical and professional meetings. Analysis was both inductive and also framed by the existing theories of a dynamic system of professions. It is argued that professional boundaries become malleable and subject to negotiation at the micro level of service delivery. Stratification within professional groups created differing responses between those working at macro, meso and micro levels of the system; from acceptance to hostility in the face of a new and potentially competing, occupational group. Overarching this state agency was the requirement to underpin legislatively the shifts in jurisdictional boundaries, such as prescribing required for vertical substitution for some of the work of doctors.

Physician associates: NHS leader accuses BMA of getting discussion wrong

Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates—not false promises

Physician associates: Doctors raise alarm over legislation to allow GMC regulation

Concerns over physician associates are missing the wood for the trees

Why the fuss about physician associates?

There is a role for physician associates in the NHS

Physician associates: Parliament was "misadvised" on RCP's support for regulation, fellows say

Physician associates: GPs vote to phase out "fundamentally unsafe" role in general practice

Physician associates: a pause in rollout is needed

In praise of physician associates

"A whirlwind of anecdotes"? The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges seems unconvinced by evidence of concerns about physician associates

Physician associates: BMA launches legal action against GMC

Doctors are under attack from all sides, BMA chair tells annual meeting

The expansion of physician associates in primary care risks alienating an already ailing GP workforce

Physician associates: BMA backs family's legal challenge to GMC over "blurring of lines"

Physician associates in primary health care in England: A challenge to professional boundaries?

Job titles in health care should be in service of patient safety, not status elevation

Are physician associates higher risk than other healthcare professionals?

Physician associates are integral to our practice

"PA mess" is a combination of self-interest and protectionism

Physician associates should not be regulated by the General Medical Council, and doctors should tell it so