Abstract:Until recently, most ecological network analyses investigating the effects of species' declines and extinctions have focused on a single type of interaction (e.g. feeding). In nature, however, diverse interactions co-occur, each of them forming a layer of a 'multilayer' network. Data including information on multiple interaction types has recently started to emerge, giving us the opportunity to have a first glance at possible commonalities in the structure of these networks. We studied the structural features of 44 tripartite ecological networks from the literature, each composed of two layers of interactions (e.g. herbivory and pollination), and investigated their robustness to species losses. Considering two interactions simultaneously, we found that the robustness of the whole community is a combination of the robustness of the two ecological networks composing it. The way in which the layers of interactions are connected to each other affects the interdependence of their robustness. In many networks, this interdependence is low, suggesting that restoration efforts would not automatically propagate through the whole community. Our results highlight the importance of considering multiple interactions simultaneously to better gauge the robustness of ecological communities to species loss and to more reliably identify key species that are important for the persistence of ecological communities. In the face of the current biodiversity crisis, predicting how species loss will affect ecological communities is becoming increasingly relevant. Previous studies including only one type of ecological interactions (e.g. feeding or pollination) revealed the relevance of the structure of ecological networks for the persistence of ecological communities. However, there is mounting evidence that considering multiple interactions simultaneously can alter the results based on a single interaction. Here, we study the robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types to the loss of plant species, and we show that it is a combination of the robustness of the two bipartite ecological networks composing the ecological community. By analyzing networks from multiple communities, we are able to identify commonalities across interaction types, as well as singularities specific to a given interaction type, caused by underlying biological constraints. Our results highlight that a multi-interaction approach is crucial to better gauge the overall robustness of ecological communities, and to correctly determine the relative importance of different plants species at the whole community level, which can be key for biodiversity conservation.

Coexistence mechanism of ecological specialists and generalists based on a network dimension reduction method

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Metacommunity Robustness of Plant-Fly-wasp Tripartite Networks with Specialization to Habitat Loss

Evaluating The Impact Of Species Specialisation On Ecological Network Robustness Using Analytic Methods

Impossible ecologies: Interaction networks and stability of coexistence in ecological communities

Predicting Tipping Points in Mutualistic Networks Through Dimension Reduction

Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks

Interspecific competition shapes the structural stability of mutualistic networks

Ecosystems with mutually exclusive interactions self-organize to a state of high diversity

Biodiversity, extinctions and evolution of ecosystems with shared resources

Biological Interactions and Cooperative Management of Multiple Species

Impact of network structure on a model of diffusion and competitive interaction

The geometry of coexistence in large ecosystems

Extinction Chains Reveal Intermediate Phases Between the Safety and Collapse in Mutualistic Ecosystems

Generalists and Specialists Determine the Trend and Rate of Soil Fungal Distance Decay of Similarity in a 20-Ha Subtropical Forest

Co-evolution of resource trade-offs driving species interactions in a host-parasite network: An exploratory model

Predicting the collapse process and tipping points for mutualistic and competitive networks with k -core method

The structure and robustness of ecological networks with two interaction types

Minimal Specialization: Coevolution of Network Structure and Dynamics

Dispersal network heterogeneity promotes species coexistence in hierarchical competitive communities