Abstract:Does an ecological community allow stable coexistence? Identifying the general principles that determine the answer to this question is a central problem of theoretical ecology. Random matrix theory approaches have uncovered the general trends of the effect of competitive, mutualistic, and predator-prey interactions between species on stability of coexistence. However, an ecological community is determined not only by the counts of these different interaction types, but also by their network arrangement. This cannot be accounted for in a direct statistical description that would enable random matrix theory approaches. Here, we therefore develop a different approach, of exhaustive analysis of small ecological communities, to show that this arrangement of interactions can influence stability of coexistence more than these general trends. We analyse all interaction networks of $N\leqslant 5$ species with Lotka-Volterra dynamics by combining exact results for $N\leqslant 3$ species and numerical exploration. Surprisingly, we find that a very small subset of these networks are "impossible ecologies", in which stable coexistence is non-trivially impossible. We prove that the possibility of stable coexistence in general ecologies is determined by similarly rare "irreducible ecologies". By random sampling of interaction strengths, we then show that the probability of stable coexistence varies over many orders of magnitude even in ecologies that differ only in the network arrangement of identical ecological interactions. Finally, we demonstrate that our approach can reveal the effect of evolutionary or environmental perturbations of the interaction network. Overall, this work reveals the importance of the full structure of the network of interactions for stability of coexistence in ecological communities.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core issue this paper attempts to address is: **Does an ecological community allow stable coexistence?** Specifically, the authors explore how competition, mutualism, and predation relationships among species in an ecological community affect the stability of coexistence. While random matrix theory has revealed the overall trends of these relationships on stability, these methods cannot account for the specific arrangement of different relationship types in the network structure. Therefore, the authors developed a new method to study the impact of network structure on coexistence stability through exhaustive analysis of small ecological communities (up to 5 species). ### Main Findings: 1. **Impossible Ecologies**: The authors found that under certain specific network structures, stable coexistence is impossible. These networks are referred to as "impossible ecologies." 2. **Irreducible Ecologies**: Among all possible network structures, there exist some fundamental "irreducible ecologies" that determine the possibility of stable coexistence in larger-scale ecological communities. 3. **Probability Distribution**: Through random sampling of interaction strengths, the authors discovered that even in ecologies with the same number of interaction types, the probability of stable coexistence can differ by several orders of magnitude, indicating that the details of the network structure have a significant impact on stability. 4. **Impact of Small Perturbations**: The authors also studied the impact of small perturbations caused by environmental or evolutionary pressures on the stability of ecologies and found that these perturbations show a certain robustness in the stability of coexistence relative to the rearrangement of the initial network structure. ### Methodology: - **Lotka-Volterra Dynamics**: The authors used the Lotka-Volterra model to describe the interactions between species. - **Exhaustive Analysis**: For small ecological communities with up to 5 species, the authors conducted exhaustive analysis, combining precise calculations and numerical simulations. - **Random Sampling**: By randomly sampling interaction strengths, the probability of stable coexistence was calculated. ### Conclusion: This study reveals the significant impact of the specific structure of interaction networks among species in ecological communities on the stability of coexistence. Traditional random matrix theory methods overlook the details of network structure, while the authors' new method emphasizes the importance of these details. This finding not only deepens our understanding of ecological stability but also provides new directions for future research.

Impossible ecologies: Interaction networks and stability of coexistence in ecological communities

Stability Criteria for Complex Ecosystems

Stable coexistence in indefinitely large systems of competing species

The geometry of coexistence in large ecosystems

Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Interaction networks in persistent Lotka-Volterra communities

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecological communities

When can higher‐order interactions produce stable coexistence?

Robust coexistence in ecological competitive communities

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecosystems

Extinctions as a vestige of instability: the geometry of stability and feasibility

The feasibility of equilibria in large ecosystems: a primary but neglected concept in the complexity-stability debate

Ecosystems with mutually exclusive interactions self-organize to a state of high diversity

Impact of network structure on a model of diffusion and competitive interaction

Topological conditions drive stability in meta-ecosystems

Dual species interaction and ecological community stability

Interconnection between density-regulation and stability in competitive ecological network

Effects of Mixing Interaction Types on Ecological Community Stability