Abstract:A reasonably general theory for predicting the outcome of coevolution among interacting species is developed. It is applied to a model for resource partitioning among competing species.Current theory for resource partitioning is based on derivations of a “limiting similarity”—i.e., a limit to how similar competitors can be to one another consistent with coexistence. This theory presumes there is a mechanism, perhaps invasion and extinction, which causes competitors to attain the limiting similarity. The view taken in this paper is that partitioning is an evolutionary compromise between pressures for character displacement and disadvantages inherent in the shift to different resource types.A set of principles is offered for the evolution of the parameters in ecological models. (1) For single population models natural selection causes the parameters ultimately to assume those values which produce the highest equilibrium population size. (2) For models of interacting populations, but without interspecific frequency-dependence, natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce either the highest or lowest equilibrium population size for any species depending on the sign of the “feedback” in the community obtained by deleting that species. (3) For models of interacting populations with interspecific frequency dependence natural selection leads to parameter values which produce intermediate equilibrium population sizes. A function called the conditional equilibrium population size is introduced. Provided (a) the mean fitness is a maximum in each species at a stable coevolutionary equilibrium and (b) there is negative density-dependence in each species then natural selection causes the parameters to assume values which produce the highest conditional equilibrium population size for each species.These coevolutionary principles, applied to a model for resource partitioning, entail that the niche separation between species relative to given niche widths, increases with the variety of available resources and decreases with the number of competing populations. Also, the evolution of character displacement between two species does not proceed far enough to maximize the equilibrium population sizes of the species involved. These results imply that the relationship between the niche overlap (of nearest neighbors) and species diversity is qualitatively different depending on whether the variety of resources at any place covaries with the species diversity there. Without covariation niche overlap increases with species diversity; with covariation overlap may decrease with species diversity. This study provides the beginning of a theory for the convergent evolution of community structure.

Ecosystems with mutually exclusive interactions self-organize to a state of high diversity

Diversity and ecotones in a model ecosystems of sessile species

When can higher‐order interactions produce stable coexistence?

Diversity begets diversity in competition for space

Mutualism provides the basis for biodiversity in eco-evolutionary community assembly

The geometry of coexistence in large ecosystems

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecosystems

Diversity begets stability: Sublinear growth and competitive coexistence across ecosystems

How self-regulation, the storage effect and their interaction contribute to coexistence in stochastic and seasonal environments

Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecological communities

Co-occurring soil bacteria exhibit a robust competitive hierarchy and lack of non-transitive interactions

Unpacking sublinear growth: diversity, stability and coexistence

Cooperative Network Dynamics

Resource partitioning among competing species—A coevolutionary approach

Heterogeneity of Interaction Strengths and Its Consequences on Ecological Systems

Local and collective transitions in sparsely-interacting ecological communities

How Clustering Promotes Biodiversity: A Solution to the Plankton Paradox

Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities

Coexistence in a variable environment: Eco-evolutionary perspectives

Basins of Coexistence and Extinction in Spatially Extended Ecosystems of Cyclically Competing Species

Boom-bust population dynamics can increase diversity in evolving competitive communities