Abstract:In ecology, there is an underappreciated but fundamental distinction between systems in which the depletion of limiting resources reduces the growth rates of competitors and systems in which resource depletion reduces the time available for competitors to grow, a mechanism we call 'competition for time'. In this study, we introduce competition for time conceptually using a simple model of interacting species and perform an experiment to determine whether competition for time is an important competitive mechanism in a field system. Indeed, we find that species respond to increased competition through reductions in their lifespan rather than their rate of growth, suggesting competition for time may be overlooked as a mechanism of biodiversity maintenance. Understanding how diversity is maintained in plant communities requires that we first understand the mechanisms of competition for limiting resources. In ecology, there is an underappreciated but fundamental distinction between systems in which the depletion of limiting resources reduces the growth rates of competitors and systems in which resource depletion reduces the time available for competitors to grow, a mechanism we call 'competition for time'. Importantly, modern community ecology and our framing of the coexistence problem are built on the implicit assumption that competition reduces the growth rate. However, recent theoretical work suggests competition for time may be the predominant competitive mechanism in a broad array of natural communities, a significant advance given that when species compete for time, diversity‐maintaining trade‐offs emerge organically. In this study, we first introduce competition for time conceptually using a simple model of interacting species. Then, we perform an experiment in a Mediterranean annual grassland to determine whether competition for time is an important competitive mechanism in a field system. Indeed, we find that species respond to increased competition through reductions in their lifespan rather than their rate of growth. In total, our study suggests competition for time may be overlooked as a mechanism of biodiversity maintenance.

Unpacking sublinear growth: diversity, stability and coexistence

Diversity begets stability: Sublinear growth and competitive coexistence across ecosystems

Ecosystems with mutually exclusive interactions self-organize to a state of high diversity

How self-regulation, the storage effect and their interaction contribute to coexistence in stochastic and seasonal environments

When can higher‐order interactions produce stable coexistence?

Stochasticity-induced stabilization in ecology and evolution: a new synthesis

The geometry of coexistence in large ecosystems

Boom-bust population dynamics can increase diversity in evolving competitive communities

Many ways to stay in the game: Individual variability maintains high biodiversity in planktonic micro-organisms

Microbial diversity and ecological complexity emerging from environmental variation and horizontal gene transfer in a simple mathematical model

Electron Energy Spectra, Fluxes, and Day-Night Asymmetries of $^{8}$B Solar Neutrinos from the 391-Day Salt Phase SNO Data Set

How Clustering Promotes Biodiversity: A Solution to the Plankton Paradox

Competition for time: Evidence for an overlooked, diversity‐maintaining competitive mechanism

Robust coexistence in ecological competitive communities

Spirals and coarsening patterns in the competition of many species: A complex Ginzburg-Landau approach

Growth tradeoffs produce complex microbial communities on a single limiting resource

Diversity Begets Stability in an Evolving Network

The Effects of Dynamical Rates on Species Coexistence in a Variable Environment: The Paradox of the Plankton Revisited

An exactly solvable coarse-grained model for species diversity

Extinctions as a vestige of instability: the geometry of stability and feasibility

Diversity begets diversity in competition for space