Abstract:The worldwide loss of species diversity brings urgency to understanding how diverse ecosystems maintain stability. Whereas early ecological ideas and classic observations suggested that stability increases with diversity, ecological theory makes the opposite prediction, leading to the long-standing "diversity-stability debate." Here, we show that this puzzle can be resolved if growth scales as a sublinear power law with biomass (exponent <1), exhibiting a form of population self-regulation analogous to models of individual ontogeny. We show that competitive interactions among populations with sublinear growth do not lead to exclusion, as occurs with logistic growth, but instead promote stability at higher diversity. Our model realigns theory with classic observations and predicts large-scale macroecological patterns. However, it makes an unsettling prediction: Biodiversity loss may accelerate the destabilization of ecosystems.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper attempts to address a core issue in ecology, namely the **diversity-stability relationship**. Specifically, the paper aims to explain why ecosystems with high biodiversity, such as tropical rainforests and coral reefs, can maintain high stability, while classical ecological theory predicts that diversity would lead to instability. ### Background and Motivation 1. **Early Ecologists' Views**: - Early ecologists believed that species diversity was one of the main factors of ecological stability, including the relative constancy of population numbers and the ability to recover from disturbances. - However, this view contradicts classical ecological theory and simple ecological models (such as the generalized Lotka-Volterra model). 2. **Predictions of Classical Theory**: - The generalized Lotka-Volterra model and Robert May's research based on random matrix theory suggest that diversity actually leads to instability. - Although many studies have found factors that can extend stability, the theory has yet to demonstrate how diversity can be a cause of stability, thus producing a positive diversity-stability relationship. 3. **Diversity-Stability Debate**: - The contradiction between this theory and observational results is known as the "diversity-stability debate," which questions the predictive power of ecological models, especially in the context of the current global biodiversity crisis. ### Main Contributions of the Paper 1. **Proposing a New Growth Model**: - The paper introduces a new "sublinear" growth model, which assumes that the growth rate of populations increases with density, but at a rate less than linear. - Compared to the traditional logistic growth model, the sublinear growth model can explain why diversity can promote stability. 2. **Consistency with Theory and Observations**: - The sublinear growth model not only shows robustness in mathematical analysis and simulations but also aligns with several macroecological patterns, such as the production-biomass ratio, species abundance distribution, mean-variance relationship, and size-density relationship. - The model also predicts that the loss of biodiversity will accelerate ecosystem instability and prolong recovery time from disturbances. 3. **Proposing a Theoretical Framework**: - The paper proposes that the sublinear growth model is a viable theoretical framework for describing population and community dynamics, helping to resolve the diversity-stability paradox. - This model is consistent with early ecological wisdom, modern macroecology, and the known conditions of some of the most precious ecosystems on Earth. ### Conclusion By introducing the sublinear growth model, the paper successfully resolves the contradiction between theory and observation regarding the diversity-stability relationship. This model not only provides a new understanding of ecosystem stability but also offers a powerful tool for predicting the impact of biodiversity loss on ecosystem functions.

Diversity begets stability: Sublinear growth and competitive coexistence across ecosystems