Design and Optimization of the Direct Recycling of Spent Li-Ion Battery Cathode Materials

Panpan Xu,Zhenzhen Yang,Xiaolu Yu,John Holoubek,Hongpeng Gao,Mingqian Li,Guorui Cai,Ira Bloom,Haodong Liu,Yan Chen,Ke An,Krzysztof Z. Pupek,Ping Liu,Zheng Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09017
2021-03-18
Abstract:Direct regeneration of spent Li-ion batteries based on the hydrothermal relithiation of cathode materials is a promising next-generation recycling technology. In order to demonstrate the feasibility of this approach at a large scale, we systematically design and optimize the process parameters to minimize both energy and raw material costs. Specifically, the effects of regenerative processing parameters on the composition, structure, and electrochemical performance of the regenerated cathode materials are investigated via systematic characterization and testing. From this analysis, it was found that the raw material costs can be substantially reduced by either replacing the typically employed 4 M LiOH solution by a cost-effective mixture of 0.1 M LiOH and 3.9 M KOH or recycling of the concentrated 4 M LiOH for continuous relithiation processes. Life cycle analysis suggests that this strategy results in reduced energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, leading to an increased potential revenue, particularly when compared with hydro- and pyrometallurgical recycling methods.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09017?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09017</a>.Effects of relithiation temperature and time on the electrochemical performance and crystal structure (Figures S1–S3 and Tables S1 and S2); CV curves of D-NCM in aqueous LiOH and KOH solutions; verification of the recyclability of LiOH solution (Figure S5); necessity of the additional Li source during the annealing step (Figure S6); effects of annealing temperature and time on the electrochemical performance (Figures S7–S10 and Table S3); composition and structure comparison of cycled pristine and relithiated NCM111 electrodes (Figure S11); validation of the scalability of the regeneration process (Figure S12 and Table S4); and methodology of the life cycle analysis of recycling methods (Figures S13–S15 and Tables S5 and S6) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09017/suppl_file/sc0c09017_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, multidisciplinary,engineering, chemical,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?