Experimental Measurement of Secondary Particle Count for Real-Time Proton Range Verification

Chuan Huang,Zhengguo Hu,Wei Lv,Yucong Chen,Xiuling Zhang,Zhiguo Xu,Faming Luo,Xinle Lang,Zulong Zhao,Ruishi Mao,Yongzhi Yin,Zhongming Wang,Di Wang,Guoqing Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3439517
2024-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
Abstract:The real-time positioning of the particle beam range during treatment is a critical technology for improving the quality of patient treatment. This paper presents a scheme for real-time proton range verification, and an experimental prototype is built at the Xi’an Proton Application Facility (XiPAF) terminal. The experiment utilized a 150 MeV passive proton beam delivery mode to bombard the polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) target for real-time proton range verification. This scheme utilizes the secondary particle counts generated per monitor unit (MU) of primary particles and does not require identification of the secondary particle species, only its deposition energy in the cerium bromide (CeBr3) scintillator module exceeding 73.24 keV. The accuracy of range verification was evaluated at various acquisition periods by establishing the relationship between secondary particle counts generated per MU of primary particles and the proton range. The range verification accuracy after one spill ( 1.67 × 10 protons) delivery was measured at 0.01 ± 0.29 mm. The accuracy of range verification within milliseconds is mainly affected by the statistical fluctuations in the secondary particle counts caused by the accumulation of activation products. Under constrained conditions, the range verification accuracy was measured at 0.16 ± 0.69 mm within 110 ms acquisition time and 0.16 ± 0.94 mm within 55 ms acquisition time. The experimental results confirm the feasibility of the scheme for real-time range verification practice. The study hopes to provide a new reference scheme for reducing the impact of range uncertainty on the patient treatment quality
What problem does this paper attempt to address?