Abstract:A large proportion of debates about China’s impacts on global economic governance lack systematic empirical analysis. We engage the debate about if China is a revolutionary, revisionist, or status quo state through a deep dive into China’s behaviors with respect to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). This research strategy is à propos because BITs represent the de facto regime governing foreign direct investment (FDI) globally, and China is the world’s second largest signatory of BITs. Drawing upon a database that we created using material on BITs available from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, we systematically examine the substantive and procedural provisions of China’s BITs from 2000 onward. Using a qualitative methodology discussed in-depth in our article, we also put China’s BIT practices in comparative perspective by comparing them against the BIT practices of Japan, a leading developed economy with BIT practices reflecting those of other established economies. Our multivariate analysis demonstrates China is not a revolutionary or dramatically revisionist player with respect to BITs. It champions positions that are neither hyper-conservative (state friendly) nor hyper-liberal (FDI friendly). To be more precise, China’s policies, especially with respect to substantive provisions, tend to be conservative, with, to some extent, some liberal aspects. Our analysis, then, indicates that commentators, businesspeople, and policymakers should be cautious about proffering claims that China is dramatically reshaping global economic governance. Aside from this important contribution to the debate, our work also expands knowledge about China’s BITs specifically and BITs generally, which does not reflect adequate attention to BITs from East Asian countries.

The China-United States BIT Negotiations: A Chinese Perspective

China-Us Bit Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications

The China-EU BIT and the Emerging 'global BIT 2.0'

China’s Role in Global Economic Governance Revisited: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese BITs

An Inquiry on US 2012 Model BIT and Its Acceptability for China

Should “the Perspective of South-North Contradictions” Be “abandoned”? – Focusing on “2012 Sino-Canada BIT”

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures

“Negative List” in Sino-EU BIT:Origins, Evolution and Prospects

China’s Perspective on Applying for the CPTPP: Enhancing Economic Interdependence As a Hedging Approach in Great Power Rivalry

Evolution of Non-discriminatory Standards in China's BITs in the Context of EU-China BIT Negotiations

The Potential EU-China BIT: Issues and Implications

The Potential Impact of China–US BIT on China’s Manufacturing Sectors

Rule Negotiation is More Important than Concession Negotiation in BITs

Review on the Mechanism of Investor-State Dispute Settlement under TPP Draft Agreement

China’s Engagement in ISDS Reform: Text, Practice, and Political Economy

The EUs New FTA Adventures and Their Implications for China

China’s Views of the TPP: Take It or Leave It, That is the Question

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options

Research on Collaborative Innovation on the“Negative List” of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone and the “Negative List” of the Sino-U.S.BIT Negotiation

Chinese Investment Treaties

Universal Scale Tipping Towards Balance-Applying the MFN Clauses in China-related Investment Arbitration: A New Haven School Reading