Abstract:A large proportion of debates about China’s impacts on global economic governance lack systematic empirical analysis. We engage the debate about if China is a revolutionary, revisionist, or status quo state through a deep dive into China’s behaviors with respect to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). This research strategy is à propos because BITs represent the de facto regime governing foreign direct investment (FDI) globally, and China is the world’s second largest signatory of BITs. Drawing upon a database that we created using material on BITs available from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, we systematically examine the substantive and procedural provisions of China’s BITs from 2000 onward. Using a qualitative methodology discussed in-depth in our article, we also put China’s BIT practices in comparative perspective by comparing them against the BIT practices of Japan, a leading developed economy with BIT practices reflecting those of other established economies. Our multivariate analysis demonstrates China is not a revolutionary or dramatically revisionist player with respect to BITs. It champions positions that are neither hyper-conservative (state friendly) nor hyper-liberal (FDI friendly). To be more precise, China’s policies, especially with respect to substantive provisions, tend to be conservative, with, to some extent, some liberal aspects. Our analysis, then, indicates that commentators, businesspeople, and policymakers should be cautious about proffering claims that China is dramatically reshaping global economic governance. Aside from this important contribution to the debate, our work also expands knowledge about China’s BITs specifically and BITs generally, which does not reflect adequate attention to BITs from East Asian countries.

Review on the Mechanism of Investor-State Dispute Settlement under TPP Draft Agreement

A Comparative Study of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: the Case of China and Pakistan Ф

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options

TPP and China's Economic Integration Law Development or Countermeasures

Review on the Practice of China＇s Participation in the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism during its Ten Years as the WTO Member

China's Free Trade Agreement Strategies

Rethinking the (CP)TPP As A Model for Regulation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures

China’s Views of the TPP: Take It or Leave It, That is the Question

Analysis of NPM Clause under Sino-American BIT Negotiation:with Respect to the Risk and Security of Chinese Oversea Investment

Analysis on TRIPS-Plus Obligations of the TPP IP Clauses

Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Multilateralization of International Investment Law

China-Us Bit Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications

Study on the Resolution Mechanism of Investment Disputes Cross the Strait

Study on the "Non-Precluded Measures" Clause in the Bilateral Investment Treaty

TPP Strategy of US and Prospect of Taiwan's Participation

Analysis of the Construction of Investor-state Investment Dispute Settlement under RCEP

China’s Role in Global Economic Governance Revisited: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese BITs

The New Gold Standard? Empirically Situating the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the Investment Treaty Universe

The Contribution of Bilateral Investment Treaties to the Development of International Investment Law: A Chinese Perspective

Comparative Studies on Dispute Settlement Systems in Regional Trade Agreements and Analysis on Contrast of Effectiveness