Abstract:A large proportion of debates about China’s impacts on global economic governance lack systematic empirical analysis. We engage the debate about if China is a revolutionary, revisionist, or status quo state through a deep dive into China’s behaviors with respect to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). This research strategy is à propos because BITs represent the de facto regime governing foreign direct investment (FDI) globally, and China is the world’s second largest signatory of BITs. Drawing upon a database that we created using material on BITs available from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, we systematically examine the substantive and procedural provisions of China’s BITs from 2000 onward. Using a qualitative methodology discussed in-depth in our article, we also put China’s BIT practices in comparative perspective by comparing them against the BIT practices of Japan, a leading developed economy with BIT practices reflecting those of other established economies. Our multivariate analysis demonstrates China is not a revolutionary or dramatically revisionist player with respect to BITs. It champions positions that are neither hyper-conservative (state friendly) nor hyper-liberal (FDI friendly). To be more precise, China’s policies, especially with respect to substantive provisions, tend to be conservative, with, to some extent, some liberal aspects. Our analysis, then, indicates that commentators, businesspeople, and policymakers should be cautious about proffering claims that China is dramatically reshaping global economic governance. Aside from this important contribution to the debate, our work also expands knowledge about China’s BITs specifically and BITs generally, which does not reflect adequate attention to BITs from East Asian countries.

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures

An Inquiry on US 2012 Model BIT and Its Acceptability for China

China-Us Bit Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications

A Comparative Study of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: the Case of China and Pakistan Ф

Study on the "Non-Precluded Measures" Clause in the Bilateral Investment Treaty

Universal Scale Tipping Towards Balance-Applying the MFN Clauses in China-related Investment Arbitration: A New Haven School Reading

8 Settlement Of Investor–State Disputes

The Contribution of Bilateral Investment Treaties to the Development of International Investment Law: A Chinese Perspective

The China-EU BIT and the Emerging 'global BIT 2.0'

The China-United States BIT Negotiations: A Chinese Perspective

China’s Role in Global Economic Governance Revisited: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese BITs

Analysis of NPM Clause under Sino-American BIT Negotiation:with Respect to the Risk and Security of Chinese Oversea Investment

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options

Evolution of Non-discriminatory Standards in China's BITs in the Context of EU-China BIT Negotiations

Should “the Perspective of South-North Contradictions” Be “abandoned”? – Focusing on “2012 Sino-Canada BIT”

Chinese Investment Treaties

Guarding the Great Wall?—jurisprudential Review of Treaty Interpretative Tools in Chinese BIT-based Arbitration Cases

Research on Collaborative Innovation on the“Negative List” of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone and the “Negative List” of the Sino-U.S.BIT Negotiation

“Negative List” in Sino-EU BIT:Origins, Evolution and Prospects

Expropriation in Transition: Evolving Chinese Investment Treaty Practices in Local and Global Contexts

Human Rights and International Investment Agreements: How to Bridge the Gap?