Abstract:A large proportion of debates about China’s impacts on global economic governance lack systematic empirical analysis. We engage the debate about if China is a revolutionary, revisionist, or status quo state through a deep dive into China’s behaviors with respect to Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). This research strategy is à propos because BITs represent the de facto regime governing foreign direct investment (FDI) globally, and China is the world’s second largest signatory of BITs. Drawing upon a database that we created using material on BITs available from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, we systematically examine the substantive and procedural provisions of China’s BITs from 2000 onward. Using a qualitative methodology discussed in-depth in our article, we also put China’s BIT practices in comparative perspective by comparing them against the BIT practices of Japan, a leading developed economy with BIT practices reflecting those of other established economies. Our multivariate analysis demonstrates China is not a revolutionary or dramatically revisionist player with respect to BITs. It champions positions that are neither hyper-conservative (state friendly) nor hyper-liberal (FDI friendly). To be more precise, China’s policies, especially with respect to substantive provisions, tend to be conservative, with, to some extent, some liberal aspects. Our analysis, then, indicates that commentators, businesspeople, and policymakers should be cautious about proffering claims that China is dramatically reshaping global economic governance. Aside from this important contribution to the debate, our work also expands knowledge about China’s BITs specifically and BITs generally, which does not reflect adequate attention to BITs from East Asian countries.

“Negative List” in Sino-EU BIT:Origins, Evolution and Prospects

Research on Collaborative Innovation on the“Negative List” of China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone and the “Negative List” of the Sino-U.S.BIT Negotiation

The EUs New FTA Adventures and Their Implications for China

China-Us Bit Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options

China’s Role in Global Economic Governance Revisited: Evidence from a Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Japanese BITs

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures

The EUs Proposal Regarding the Establishment of the Investment Court System and the Response from Asia

The Impact of the Second Phase of China-South Korea FTA Negotiation on China's Service Trade -- Simulation Analysis Based on GTAP Model

Analysis of the China-EU Comprehensive Agreement on Investment from Perspectives of EU Competences and Decision-Making Procedures

Study on the "Non-Precluded Measures" Clause in the Bilateral Investment Treaty

Scaling the Great Wall: The EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment and Market Access

China’s Foreign Investment Encouraged Catalogue and Negative Lists as a Tool of Foreign Direct Investment Attraction

The Contribution of Bilateral Investment Treaties to the Development of International Investment Law: A Chinese Perspective

Future China-EU Trade and Economic Relations under the Background of European Debt Crisis

China’s Concerns on the Core Issues of Digital Trade

China’s Views of the TPP: Take It or Leave It, That is the Question

The Status Quo and the Future of Sino-German Tax Treaty

Analysis of EU Eastern Expansion's Negative Impact on Central and East European Countries

Rule Negotiation is More Important than Concession Negotiation in BITs

Utilizing binary coding to determine the impact of prior relations on free trade agreement benefits with China