Abstract:ObjectiveTo present the pooled quantitative evidence of basic profiles, initial treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes in patients with isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD).MethodsA comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of all available studies reporting IAAD, retrieved from the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases. The logistic normal random effect model was fitted using the generalised linear mixed model with random intercepts to calculate the pooled proportion estimates.ResultsSeventeen studies with 482 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Male smokers with hyperlipidaemia and hypertension were the most prominent basic profile. IAADs were predominantly spontaneous and infrarenal, and roughly half were acute and symptomatic. Approximately 67% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42–86%] of patients were managed initially conservatively. In the overall population, the 30 day all cause mortality was 3% (95% CI 1–5%) and the long term mortality during follow up was 8% (95% CI 5–14%). Re-intervention during follow up occurred in 8% (95% CI 5–15%) of patients. In the subgroup analysis, patients with conservative treatment had a 30 day mortality of 1% (95% CI 0–8%), a long term mortality of 5% (95% CI 1–29%), and a re-intervention rate of 18% (95% CI 10–29%). Patients with open surgery had a 30 day mortality of 9% (95% CI 0–82%), a long term mortality of 12% (95% CI 4–31%), and a re-intervention rate of 9% (95% CI 1–44%). Patients with endovascular repair had a 30 day mortality of 2% (95% CI 0–10%), a long term mortality of 5% (95% CI 2–13%), a re-intervention rate of 6% (95% CI 3–13%), and a persistent endoleak rate of 4% (95% CI 2–10%).ConclusionAppropriate initial treatment strategies can be used to obtain acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with IAAD. Invasive intervention is necessary if patients match certain indications for intervention. Regular imaging surveillance should be provided for all patients, especially those treated conservatively. To present the pooled quantitative evidence of basic profiles, initial treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes in patients with isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD). A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of all available studies reporting IAAD, retrieved from the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Databases. The logistic normal random effect model was fitted using the generalised linear mixed model with random intercepts to calculate the pooled proportion estimates. Seventeen studies with 482 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Male smokers with hyperlipidaemia and hypertension were the most prominent basic profile. IAADs were predominantly spontaneous and infrarenal, and roughly half were acute and symptomatic. Approximately 67% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42–86%] of patients were managed initially conservatively. In the overall population, the 30 day all cause mortality was 3% (95% CI 1–5%) and the long term mortality during follow up was 8% (95% CI 5–14%). Re-intervention during follow up occurred in 8% (95% CI 5–15%) of patients. In the subgroup analysis, patients with conservative treatment had a 30 day mortality of 1% (95% CI 0–8%), a long term mortality of 5% (95% CI 1–29%), and a re-intervention rate of 18% (95% CI 10–29%). Patients with open surgery had a 30 day mortality of 9% (95% CI 0–82%), a long term mortality of 12% (95% CI 4–31%), and a re-intervention rate of 9% (95% CI 1–44%). Patients with endovascular repair had a 30 day mortality of 2% (95% CI 0–10%), a long term mortality of 5% (95% CI 2–13%), a re-intervention rate of 6% (95% CI 3–13%), and a persistent endoleak rate of 4% (95% CI 2–10%). Appropriate initial treatment strategies can be used to obtain acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with IAAD. Invasive intervention is necessary if patients match certain indications for intervention. Regular imaging surveillance should be provided for all patients, especially those treated conservatively.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Current Literature on Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection.

Endovascular treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection and postoperative aortic remodeling.

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection:a report of 27 cases

Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection With and Without Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Incidence and natural history of isolated abdominal aortic dissection: A population-based assessment from 1995 to 2015

Clinical characteristics and therapeutic strategy for patients with spontaneous isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Factors Associated With Increased Mortality After Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection Repair

Endovascular Repair of Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection. Literature Review

Complicated and Uncomplicated Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissections Demonstrate Different Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Non-A non-B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment strategy based on the natural course of the disease for patients with spontaneous isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Acute Symptomatic Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection - Clinical Characteristics, Outcome, and Sex Differences

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Systematic Review of the Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with Mesenteric Malperfusion

Endovascular treatment of acute and chronic isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Similar Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodeling in Bifurcated and Straight Aortic Stent Grafts Used to Treat Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection

Reintervention after Endovascular Repair for Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Perioperative Survival Rate and Relevant Risk Factors in Patients with Aortic Dissection

Population-Based Assessment of Aortic-Related Outcomes in Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

Management of Extensive Aorto-Iliac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 9319 Patients