Abstract:Objective: Open surgical repair for acute aortic pathologies involving the visceral vessels is associated with morbidity and mortality rates of 40% to 70% and 30% to 60%, respectively. Due to these poor outcomes, the application of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) has been expanded in this setting; however, durability remains unknown. The purpose of this analysis was to describe outcomes after F/B-EVAR for acute aortic disease. Methods: A single center retrospective review of all F/B-EVARs for acute aortic disease was completed. Primary end points included mortality and reintervention-free survival. Secondary end points were patency and freedom from endoleak, as well as change in aneurysm diameter and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Life-tables were used to estimate end points, while mixed statistical models were used to determine aneurysm diameter change. Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 67 ± 10 years; 75% male) underwent F/B-EVAR for acute aortic disease, and median follow-up time was 10.3 months (range, 0.5-31.4 months). Indications included thoracoabdominal aneurysm (65%; n = 24), pararenal aneurysm (17%; n = 6), postsurgical anastomotic pseudoaneurysm (8%; n = 3), dissection (5%; n = 2), and penetrating ulcer (5%; n = 2). Mean preoperative aneurysm diameter was 7.3 ± 1.8 cm. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV or IV-E, and 38% (n = 14) had history of aortic repair. There were 105 visceral vessels revascularized (celiac, 26; superior mesenteric artery, 29; renal, 50) and 24 (65%) patients underwent three- or four-vessel repair. Technical success was 92% (n = 34), with no intraoperative deaths and one conversion (3%). Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 2-60 days), and postoperative morbidity was 41% (n = 15; spinal cord ischemia, 14% [8% permanent]; pulmonary, 14%; renal, 14%; extremity ischemia, 8%; stroke, 5%; cardiac, 3%; bleeding, 3%) with 30-day mortality of 19% (n = 7; in-hospital, 8%; n = 3). Endoleak was detected at some point in follow-up in 27% (n = 10), and a majority were type II (n = 7). Six (16%) patients underwent reintervention, and no late conversions occurred. Postoperative imaging was available in 27 (73%), and one celiac fenestration lost patency at 12 months. One-year branch vessel patency and freedom from reintervention was 98% ± 6% and 70% ± 9%, respectively. Estimated 1- and 4-year survival were 70% ± 8% and 67% ± 8%, respectively. During follow-up, aortic diameter decreased 0.5 cm (95% confidence interval, 1.1-0.2; P = .1) while estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by 2 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Conclusions: F/B-EVAR can be performed to treat a variety of symptomatic and/or ruptured paravisceral aortic pathologies. Perioperative morbidity and mortality can be significant; however, it is less than literature-based outcomes of open repair. Short-term fenestrated/branched graft patency is excellent, but reintervention is frequent, highlighting the need for diligent follow-up. Patients surviving the initial hospitalization for F/B-EVAR of acute aortic disease can anticipate good long-term survival.

Endovascular treatment of acute and chronic isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Endovascular treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection and postoperative aortic remodeling.

Endovascular aneurysm repair for aorto-iliac artery pathologies in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

[Endovascular Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with the Complex Aortic Anatomy].

Outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated-branched endograft repair for acute aortic pathology

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated abdominal aortic dissection:a report of 27 cases

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

[Complications in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Treatment and Prevention].

[Short to Midterm Results of Endovascular for 105 Case of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms].

Endovascular Repair of Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection. Literature Review

Long‐Term Outcomes of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Contemporary Results of Endovascular Repair of Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection with Unibody Bifurcated Stent Grafts.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic or iliac artery pathologies in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Endovascular Therapy for Nonischemic vs Ischemic Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Similar Midterm Clinical Outcomes and Aortic Remodeling in Bifurcated and Straight Aortic Stent Grafts Used to Treat Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection

Endovascular Repair of Aneurysms or Dissection Aneurysms of the Aortic Arch-Preliminary Experiences in 14 Cases

Endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection and its midterm results

Early Intervention Effects of Open Repair and Endovascular Aortic Repair on Patients Suffering from 40-54 Mm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Single Center Experience.

[Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: a Clinical Report of 81 Cases].

Endovascular Treatment for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Combined with Bilateral Common Iliac Artery Aneurysm