Population-Based Assessment of Aortic-Related Outcomes in Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer
Salome Weiss,Indrani Sen,Ying Huang,W. Scott Harmsen,Thomas C. Bower,Gustavo S. Oderich,Philip P. Goodney,Randall R. DeMartino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.004
IF: 1.5
2020-11-01
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:ObjectiveAim was to analyze aortic-related outcomes after diagnosis of aortic dissection (AD), intramural hematoma (IMH), and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) from a population-based approach.MethodsRetrospective review of an incident cohort of AD, IMH, and PAU patients in Olmsted County, MN from 1995-2015. Primary end-point was aortic death. Secondary end-points were subsequent aortic events (aortic intervention, new dissection or rupture not present at presentation) and first-time diagnosis of an aortic aneurysm. Outcomes were compared to randomly selected population referents matched for age and sex in a 3:1 ratio using Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for comorbidities.ResultsAmong 133 patients (77 AD, 21 IMH, 35 PAU), 57% were male and mean age was 71.8 years (SD 14). Median follow-up was 10 years. Of 73 deaths among AD/IMH/PAU patients, 23 (32%) were aortic-related. Estimated freedom from aortic death was 84%, 80% and 77% at 5, 10, and 15 years. There were no aortic deaths among population referents (adjusted HR for aortic death in AD/IMH/PAU 184.7, 95% CI 10.3 – 3299.2, p<.001). Fifty (38%) AD/IMH/PAU patients had a subsequent aortic event (aortic intervention, new dissection or rupture) while there were eight (2%) aortic events among population referents (all elective aneurysm repairs; adjusted HR for any aortic event and aortic intervention in AD/IMH/PAU patients 33.3, 95% CI 15.3 – 72.0, p<.001 and 31.5, 95% CI 14.5 – 68.4, p<.001, respectively). After excluding aortic events/interventions ≤14 days of diagnosis, AD/IMH/PAU patients remained at increased risk of any aortic event (adjusted HR 10.8, 95% CI 3.9 – 29.8, p<.001) and aortic intervention (adjusted HR 9.6, 95% CI 3.4 – 26.8, p<.001). Among those subjects with available follow-up imaging, the risk of first-time diagnosis of aortic aneurysm was significantly increased for AD/IMH/PAU patients when compared to population referents (adjusted HR 10.9, 95% CI 5.4 – 21.7, p<.001 and 8.3, 95% CI 4.1 – 16.7, p<.001 for thoracic and abdominal aneurysms respectively) and remained increased when excluding aneurysms that formed within 14 days of AD/IMH/PAU (adjusted HR of 6.2, 95% CI 1.8 – 21.1, p=.004 and 2.8, 95% CI 1.0 – 7.6, p=.040 for thoracic and abdominal aneurysms respectively).ConclusionsAD/IMH/PAU patients have a substantial risk of aortic death, any aortic event, aortic intervention, and first-time diagnosis of aortic aneurysm that persists even when the acute phase (≤14 days after diagnosis) is uncomplicated. Advances in post-diagnosis treatment are necessary to improve the prognosis in these patients.
surgery,peripheral vascular disease