Abstract:Background Acute penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) are reported to dynamically evolve into different clinical outcomes ranging from regression to aortic rupture, but no practice guidelines are available in China. Methods and Results All 109 patients with acute PAUs were monitored clinically. At 30 days follow‐up, 31 patients (28.44%) suffered from aortic‐related adverse events, a composite of aortic‐related mortality, aortic dissection, or an enlarged ulcer. In addition, 7 (6.42%) patients had clinically related adverse events, including all‐cause mortality, cerebral stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, acute heart failure alone or acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure, acute renal failure, arrhythmia, and bleeding events. In the present study, the intervention criteria for the Chinese PAU population included a PAU diameter of 12.5 mm and depth of 9.5 mm. The multivariate analysis showed that an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm (hazard ratio [HR], 3.846; 95% CI, 1.561–9.476; P =0.003) and an ulcer depth >9.5 mm (HR, 3.359; 95% CI, 1.505–7.494; P =0.003) were each independent predictors of aortic‐related events. Conclusions Patients with acute PAUs were at high risk for aortic‐related adverse events and clinically related adverse events within 30 days after onset. Patients with an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm or an ulcer depth >9.5 mm have a higher risk for disease progression, and early intervention may be recommended. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms AAS acute aortic syndrome AD aortic dissection EVAR endovascular repair PAUs penetrating aortic ulcers Clinical Perspective What Is New? The first penetrating aortic ulcer intervention criteria for the Chinese patients were 12.5 mm for ulcer diameter and 9.5 mm for ulcer depth. What Are the Clinical Implications? Patients with acute penetrating aortic ulcers were at high risk for aortic‐related adverse events and clinically related adverse events within 30 days after onset. Patients with an ulcer diameter >12.5 mm or an ulcer depth >9.5 mm have a higher risk for disease progression, and early intervention may be recommended. In aortic diseases, both penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) and aortic dissection (AD) are classified as acute aortic syndrome (AAS). 1 PAUs account for 2% to 7% of AAS cases and may deteriorate to AD, aneurysm formation, and aortic rupture. 2 The etiology of the PAU is not clear and may be related to an atheromatous plaque that disrupts the internal elastic lamina without a false lumen. 3 The PAU, a special type of AAS 4 that is similar to AD and intramural hematoma in terms of its clinical manifestation, has unique pathological features and clinical outcomes that are different from those of other types of AAS. 5 Furthermore, the long‐term evolution of the PAU is unclear. The American guidelines recommend endovascular repair (EVAR) for asymptomatic PAU (III C) and symptomatic PAU (II b C). 6 The European guidelines recognize PAU as a type of AAS with a surgical indication (II b C). For type B PAU, the European guidelines suggest medical treatment (I C), but complicated type B PAU may be considered for EVAR (II a C) or surgery (II b C). 7 There are only a few case reports of PAUs, and the amount of detailed, large‐scale, real‐world clinical data reported for Chinese patients with PAUs is small. Thus, the present study aims to examine the imaging characteristics and clinical prognoses of PAUs and to explore the predictors of aortic‐related adverse events in cases of acute PAUs. METHODS This study was a non‐interventional retrospective and observational clinical data analysis study. It has been reviewed and approved by the eth -Abstract Truncated-

Population-Based Assessment of Aortic-Related Outcomes in Aortic Dissection, Intramural Hematoma, and Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

Incidence and natural history of isolated abdominal aortic dissection: A population-based assessment from 1995 to 2015

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Outcome of Endovascular and Open Treated Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

Acute Aortic Dissection: Observational Lessons Learned From 11 000 Patients

Factors Associated with Early Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection—A Single-Centre Experience

ORal anticoagulation risks late aortic intervention in Conservatively managed type B Aortic dissection (ORCA study)

Acute non-A non-B aortic dissection: incidence, treatment and outcome

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcers and intramural hematomas is associated with poor outcomes

Outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection and concomitant lower extremity malperfusion

Risk Factors for Mortality in Acute Aortic Dissection Type A: A Centre Experience Over 15 Years

Mortality after non-surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection is higher than previously reported

Acute Symptomatic Isolated Abdominal Aortic Dissection - Clinical Characteristics, Outcome, and Sex Differences

Predictors of Late Adverse Events in Patients with Surgically Treated Type I Aortic Dissection

Treatment Strategies for Acute Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion: A Retrospective Study

Acute Type A Intramural Hematoma: The Less Deadly Acute Aortic Syndrome?

Immediate Recognition and Surgical Treatment of Iatrogenic Acute Type A Aortic Dissection is Associated with Low Hospital Mortality and High Intermediate-Term Survival

Long-Term Imaging Evolution and Clinical Prognosis Among Patients With Acute Penetrating Aortic Ulcers: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Surgical treatment in the chronic phase for uncomplicated Stanford type B aortic dissection

The challenge of associated intramural hematoma with endovascular repair for penetrating ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta

Clinical Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Single Study From China