Abstract:ESG information disclosure is an essential aspect of corporate ESG responsibility and has gained significant attention in the context of ecological civilization development within the socialist market economy. However, in China's early stage of ESG development, challenges such as ESG rating discrepancies, "greenwashing", and corporate "cleansing" accompany ESG information disclosure. This study aims to investigate the impact of corporate ESG information disclosure on audit fees using a sample of non-financial A-share listed companies in China from 2011 to 2020. Drawing on the "deep pocket" theory, risk premium theory, and cost-benefit principle, the research examines the relationship between ESG information disclosure and audit fees. The findings reveal that approximately one-third of Chinese enterprises disclose ESG information, and substantial variation exists in the disclosure scores among the disclosed firms. The empirical analysis further demonstrates that firms disclosing ESG information tend to face higher audit fees, with higher ESG disclosure scores associated with increased audit fees. Moreover, an increase in the disclosure score of any ESG dimension (environment, social responsibility, and corporate governance) leads to higher audit fees. The study also identifies operational risk as a mediating factor in the relationship between ESG disclosure and audit fees. Additionally, media attention can dampen the positive effect of ESG disclosure scores on audit fees. Furthermore, the impact of ESG disclosure scores on audit fees is more pronounced in firms that voluntarily disclose ESG information before the implementation of the new Environmental Protection Law. These findings contribute to the literature and provide theoretical insights for governmental and regulatory decision-making, corporate managers, auditors, and ESG investors in China.

Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Environmental Law Enforcement and Audit Fees

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

Do Big Auditors Always Perform Better?——Evidence from China's rights issuers and non-issuers

Do Environmental Administrative Penalties Affect Audit Fees? Results from Multiple Econometric Models

The effect of environmental credit rating on audit fees: A quasi-natural experiment from China

Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China

Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Exploring the relationship between corporate ESG information disclosure and audit fees: evidence from non-financial A-share listed companies in China

Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits

Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Regulated Changes in Audit Fee Disclosure and Improvement of Audit Environment:Evidence from China's Auditing Market

The impact of ESG performance on audit fees - a study based on a two-way fixed effects model

Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from China

Does the green credit policy improve audit fees? Evidence from Chinese firms

Environmental regulation, agency costs and financial performance: based on the release of "the new Environmental Protection Law"

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

ESG rating divergence and audit fees: Evidence from China

Environmental jurisdiction and energy efficiency: Evidence from China's establishment of environmental courts

The Impact of Climate Information Disclosure on Audit Fees: A Study Based on Principal Component Analysis

Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on Certified Public Accountant Audit of Chinese Listed Companies in the Energy Industry