Abstract:The environmental problems caused by carbon emission have become the focus of worldwide attention. Effective control of carbon emissions cannot be achieved without the protection of the rule of law. Environment public interests litigation is a prominent innovation in the judicial system, and its role in supervising the government to perform its regulatory duties on carbon reduction and regulating the carbon emission behaviors of enterprises and the public deserves discussion. The paper selected the panel data from 274 prefecture-level cities from 2013 to 2021 and analyzed the impact of a procuratorial public interest litigation pilot policy on carbon emission control by using the double difference method. The research found that the procuratorial public interest litigation pilot policy can effectively curb carbon emissions. Heterogeneity analysis showed that in cities with relatively low level of green innovation, the negative correlation between procuratorial public interest litigation pilot policies and carbon emissions is more significant. Compared with the eastern region, in the central and western regions, especially in the central region, where the concept, policy, and funding of carbon emission governance are relatively weak, the implementation of the pilot policy of procuratorial public interest litigation had a more obvious effect on carbon emission governance. Mechanism tests showed that procuratorial public interest litigation policies reduce carbon emissions by reducing energy consumption and increasing public participation in environmental protection. The study will provide an empirical basis for the carbon emission reduction effect on pilot policy of procuratorial public interest litigation and will offer certain theoretical recommendations for improving the procuratorial public interest litigation system in the ecological environment field.

Environmental jurisdiction and energy efficiency: Evidence from China's establishment of environmental courts

Environmental judicial independence and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Can strengthening environmental justice promote carbon reduction? Evidence from environmental courts in China

Effect of Environmental Courts on Pollution Abatement: A Spatial Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Environmental judicial reform and corporate investment behavior - Based on a quasi-natural experiment of environmental courts

Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China

Environmental legal institutions and management earnings forecasts: Evidence from the establishment of environmental courts in China

The rule of law strengthening on corporate green innovation: a quasi-natural experiment based on the establishment of environmental courts in China

Environmental information disclosure and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from China

Does environmental public interest litigation improve the urban land green use efficiency?-Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Empirical analysis of the role of the environmental accountability system in energy conservation and emission reduction in China

Environmental Justice Specialization and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China Environmental Protection Court

Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China

How can market-oriented environmental regulation improve urban energy efficiency? Evidence from quasi-experiment in China's SO2 trading emissions system

Is Public Participation Weak Environmental Regulation? Experience from China's Environmental Public Interest Litigation Pilots

Market supervision, innovation offsets and energy efficiency: Evidence from environmental pollution liability insurance in China

Governmental Inspection and Local Legislation on Environmental Protection: Evidence from China

Impact Study of Environment Public Interests Litigation on Carbon Emissions: Taking Pilot Policy of Procuratorial Public Interest Litigation as a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Environmental judicature and enterprises’ green technology innovation: A revisit of the porter hypothesis

Justice as efficiency: courts and the allocation of electricity in China

Environmental regulation and energy efficiency: evidence from daily penalty policy in China