Effect of Tissue Fixatives on the Corrosion of Biomedical Magnesium Alloys

Guanqi Liu,Ziyu Yan,Yuzhu Guo,Chuanbin Guo,Chengwen Tan,Jianhua Zhu,Jianmin Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30286
IF: 3.776
2024-01-01
Heliyon
Abstract:In this work, the corrosion behavior of pure Mg, Mg3Ag, Mg6Ag, and MgZnYNd alloys in different fixatives (ethyl alcohol (EA), 85% ethyl alcohol (85% EA), 10% neutral buffered formalin (10% NBF), 4% glutaric dialdehyde (4% GD), and 4% paraformaldehyde (4% PFA)) was investigated to provide a valuable reference for the selection of fixatives during the histological evaluation of Mg implants. Through the hydrogen evolution test, pH test, and corrosion morphology and product characterization, it was found that corrosion proceeded slowest in the EA and 85% EA groups, slightly faster in 4% GD, faster in 10% NBF, and fastest in 4% PFA. After corrosion, the EA group surface remained unchanged, while the 85%EA group surface developed minor cracks and warping. The 4%GD fixative formed a dense needle-like protective layer on the Mg substrate. The 10%NBF group initially grew a uniform layer, but later developed irregular pits due to accelerated corrosion. In contrast, the 4%PFA solution caused more severe corrosion attributed to chloride ions. The main corrosion products in the EA and 85%EA groups were MgO and Mg(OH)2, while the other fixatives containing diverse ions also yielded phosphates like Mg3(PO4)2 and MgHPO4. In 4% PFA, AgCl formed on the surface of Mg6Ag alloy after corrosion. Therefore, to minimize Mg alloy corrosion without compromising staining quality, EA or 85% EA is recommended, while 4% PFA is not recommended due to its significant impact.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?